Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of amplification systems in a classroom.

A K Nábĕlek, A M Donahue, T R Letowski

    Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Three listening systems—audio induction loop (AL), frequency modulation (FM), and infrared (IR)—outperform public address (PA) systems for hearing-impaired individuals. These systems improve word identification in noisy environments for diverse hearing groups.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Performance of two rapid, single-use immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A.

    Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease·2001
    Same author

    Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios.

    Ear and hearing·1998
    Same author

    Accuracy of pointing a binaural listening array.

    Human factors·1998
    Same author

    Perception of nonlinear and linear formant trajectories.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1997
    Same author

    Detection and recognition of octave-band sound effects.

    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1996
    Same author

    Cues for perception of synthetic and natural diphthongs in either noise or reverberation.

    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1996

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Assistive Listening Devices
    • Speech Perception

    Background:

    • Listening systems aid hearing-impaired individuals, offering personalized sound control and reducing noise.
    • Traditional public address (PA) systems may not adequately serve those with hearing loss.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the effectiveness of audio induction loop (AL), frequency modulation (FM), and infrared (IR) listening systems against a PA system.
    • To evaluate system performance across different listener groups and acoustic conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • A comparative study was conducted in a classroom setting.
    • Word identification was assessed using the Modified Rhyme Test under varying speech-to-noise ratios (S/N) and with/without background babble.
    • Participants included normal hearing, hearing-impaired, hearing aid users, and elderly individuals.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Significant main effects were found for systems, listener groups, and room signal-to-noise ratio (S/N).
    • Interactions between systems and groups, and systems and S/N, were also significant.
    • All three tested listening systems (AL, FM, IR) demonstrated superior word identification scores compared to the PA system for all listener groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Audio induction loop (AL), frequency modulation (FM), and infrared (IR) listening systems are effective alternatives to PA systems for individuals with hearing impairments.
    • These assistive listening devices enhance speech perception in challenging acoustic environments.
    • The study confirms the suitability of AL, FM, and IR systems for diverse hearing loss populations.