Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The mandatory sentence and Section 2.

S Dell

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |March 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Psychiatrists

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Conserving large carnivores: dollars and fence.

    Ecology letters·2013
    Same author

    Chest health surveillance utility in the early detection of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in children after allo-SCT.

    Bone marrow transplantation·2012
    Same author

    Health outcomes in low-income children with current asthma in Canada.

    Chronic diseases in Canada·2009
    Same author

    Massive hemoptysis in an 11-year-old girl with isolated pulmonary arteritis.

    Pediatric pulmonology·2006
    Same author

    1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) and microwave-accelerated green chemistry in methylation of phenols, indoles, and benzimidazoles with dimethyl carbonate.

    Organic letters·2002
    Same author

    Breastfeeding and asthma in young children: findings from a population-based study.

    Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine·2001
    Same journal

    Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics briefing.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Medical ethics and categorisation.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Forensic Psychiatry
    • Legal Medicine
    • Criminal Law

    Background:

    • Sentencing for homicide is influenced by psychiatric evaluations of mental state.
    • Section 2 considerations often involve emotional distress and stress, not just clear mental disorders.
    • The legal system relies on psychiatric input for assessing diminished responsibility.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the impact of psychiatric opinions on homicide sentencing under Section 2.
    • To examine the role of psychiatrists in determining mandatory life sentences versus judicial review.
    • To highlight the anomalies and injustices arising from current sentencing practices.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal precedents and psychiatric guidelines related to Section 2.
    • Analysis of case law where diminished responsibility was considered.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the intersection between psychiatric testimony and mandatory sentencing laws.

    • Main Results:

    • Psychiatric opinions on emotional factors significantly influence whether mitigating factors are reviewed.
    • Doctors' interpretations of Section 2 can inadvertently determine mandatory life sentences.
    • Current practices lead to inconsistencies and potential injustices in homicide sentencing.

    Conclusions:

    • Abolishing mandatory sentences for murder could remedy the anomalies and injustices identified.
    • Psychiatric expertise should focus on medical aspects, not legal/moral judgments, to avoid undue influence on sentencing.
    • Reform is needed to ensure fairer sentencing in homicide cases.