Is Naltrexone Effective and Safe for Treating Amphetamine-Type Stimulant Use Disorder? A Systematic Review and
Gabriel Bastien1, Christina McAnulty, Heidar Sharafi
1Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (GB, CM, HS, AM, LE, SD, DJ-A); Research Centre, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (GB, CM, HS, AM, LE, SD, L-CJ, DJ-A); Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (DZ, SD, L-CJ); and Departement of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (L-CJ).
Objectives:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023401796) of randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness and safety of naltrexone as a standalone pharmacotherapy for amphetamine-type stimulant use disorder (ATSUD).
Methods:
We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and trial registries on April 11, 2023, and updated on September 24, 2024, to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of naltrexone for the treatment of ATSUD. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines were followed for reporting the study. Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed with the Cochrane Risk-of-bias Assessment tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Risk ratios (RRs) or Peto odds ratio were estimated for binary outcomes as appropriate. Standardized mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes.
Results:
Five studies (n = 419 participants) were eligible. We found no significant difference between naltrexone and placebo for amphetamine-type stimulant use (RR = 0.903, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.698 to 1.167, P = 0.44, I2 = 96.1%; 4 studies), study retention (RR = 1.055, 95% CI = 0.942 to 1.182, P = 0.35, I2 = 45.0%; 4 studies), end-of-treatment craving (standardized mean difference = 0.069, 95% CI = -0.272 to 0.410, P = 0.69, I2 = 0.0%; 2 studies), and serious adverse events (odds ratio = 1.086, 95% CI = 0.414 to 2.849, P = 0.87, I2 = 0.0%; 3 studies). The quality of evidence was low to very low.
Conclusions:
The available evidence does not support the use of standalone naltrexone to treat ATSUD. Significant research efforts must be put toward to identify effective pharmacotherapies to complement psychosocial interventions for ATSUD.
More Related Videos
09:16A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
09:29Investigating Drivers of Antireward in Addiction Behavior with Anatomically Specific Single-Cell Gene Expression Methods
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
CNS Depressants: Alcohol and Nicotine
Drug Abuse and Addiction: Pharmacological Phenomena
Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Stimulants
Ganglionic stimulants activate NM nicotinic receptors in autonomic ganglia, falling into two categories: nicotine mimetics [e.g., lobeline, dimethylpiperazine, tetramethylammonium] and muscarinic receptor agonists [e.g., muscarine, methacholine]. The first category's action is rapid and blocked by nicotinic receptor antagonists, while the second category's action is delayed and blocked by atropine-like agents. Nicotine, an alkaloid, affects the heart rate by stimulating...
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
