Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

07:15
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
6.7K
Decoding Radiomics: A Step-by-Step Guide to Machine Learning Workflow in Hand-Crafted and Deep Learning Radiomics
Maurizio Cè1, Marius Dumitru Chiriac2, Andrea Cozzi3
1Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 27, 2024
Summary
Radiomics research shows promise but faces challenges in clinical use due to methodological issues. This review guides radiologists in evaluating radiomics study quality using the METRICS tool for better clinical impact.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Radiomics research has rapidly expanded, extracting diagnostic and prognostic data from medical images (CT, PET, MRI).
- A significant gap exists between radiomics research findings and their clinical implementation, largely due to methodological challenges.
- Radiologists need foundational knowledge to evaluate radiomics workflows and collaborate on clinically impactful models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a systematic guide to the radiomics study pipeline for radiologists.
- To introduce and detail the application of the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS, 2024) for assessing radiomics study quality.
- To support researchers and reviewers in evaluating radiomics study robustness and facilitating clinical translation.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of the radiomics study pipeline, covering design, preprocessing, feature selection, and model validation.
- Step-by-step guide on applying the METRICS (2024) tool for quality assessment.
- Focus on foundational knowledge for radiologists without specialized machine learning expertise.
Main Results:
- The review outlines a comprehensive radiomics workflow from study design to performance evaluation.
- The METRICS tool is presented as a structured method for appraising the quality and robustness of radiomics studies.
- The paper emphasizes the importance of methodological rigor for clinical translation.
Conclusions:
- Effective evaluation of radiomics study quality is crucial for bridging the gap between research and clinical practice.
- The METRICS tool offers a standardized approach for assessing radiomics research quality.
- This guide empowers radiologists to critically evaluate radiomics studies and contribute to developing reliable clinical tools.

