Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.3K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.3K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.4K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

79
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
79
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

38.8K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
38.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond Retrieval Competition: Asymmetric Effects of Retroactive and Proactive Interference in Associative Memory.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Retrieval Competition in Proactive Interference: Effects of Encoding Strength and Consolidation in the Modified Modified Free Recall Paradigm.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

The Effects of Teacher Rewards and Their Types on Preschool Children's Selective Trust.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Was the study time allocation based on expectation-maximization in value-test likelihood tradeoff situation?

Psychological research·2025
Same author

The Effect of Item Strength on Retrieval-Induced Forgetting in Social Interaction.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

640

Bounded Rationality in Study Time Allocation: Evidence Based on Risky Choice Framing Effects.

Hui Xu1, Yuanxia Gao1, Qian Xiao1,2

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.

Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 27, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Learners exhibit bounded rationality when allocating study time for exams, as framing effects influence their decisions despite equivalent probabilities. This challenges traditional expected utility theory in educational contexts.

Keywords:
ABR modelbounded rationalityexpected utility theoryframing effectsitem selectionmetacognitionmetamemorystudy time allocation

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

640
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.0K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Students face value-test likelihood trade-offs when preparing for standardized English exams.
  • Optimizing study time requires balancing item difficulty, point values, and testing probability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how framing effects influence study time allocation in a simulated exam context.
  • To determine if study time allocation demonstrates bounded rationality, deviating from expected utility theory.

Main Methods:

  • 41 college students self-regulated study time for two item types: 1-point (90% likelihood) and 9-point (10% likelihood).
  • Item likelihoods were presented using different frames: emphasizing probability of testing vs. probability of not testing.
  • Risky choice framing effects on study time allocation were examined.

Main Results:

  • Study time allocation significantly differed between the two equivalent framings.
  • Framing effects demonstrated a deviation from purely rational decision-making.
  • Participants allocated more time to items framed with a higher probability of being tested.

Conclusions:

  • Study time allocation is influenced by framing effects, indicating bounded rationality.
  • The findings contradict the predictions of expected utility theory in this learning context.
  • Understanding cognitive biases is crucial for improving study strategies and educational interventions.