Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

23:56
Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
16.7K
Development of Priority Assistive Product Lists in Three African Countries
Emma M Smith1, Ying Zhang2, Laura Ligthart2
1Assisting Living and Learning Institute, Maynooth University, W23 H2H6 Maynooth, Ireland.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
|November 27, 2024
Summary
National Assistive Product Lists (APLs) vary significantly based on user needs and country context. Collaborative development considering population needs and local factors is crucial for effective assistive product delivery systems.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Disability Studies
- Health Policy
Background:
- Assistive products (APs) are vital for improving the quality of life for individuals with disabilities and functional limitations.
- National Assistive Product Lists (APLs) are key to enhancing access to these essential products.
- Understanding variations in APL development can inform better AP service delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the influence of the World Health Organization's 5Ps model on national APL development in Malawi, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.
- To identify factors contributing to differences in national APLs across these three countries.
- To provide insights for enhancing AP service delivery systems.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 key representatives from government and non-state organizations involved in APL development.
- Directed content analysis was used to analyze interview data, guided by the 5Ps framework (people, personnel, policy, provision, products).
- Comparative analysis of APL development processes across Malawi, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.
Main Results:
- Significant differences were observed in the national APLs of Malawi, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.
- Population needs (people) were the primary driver for product selection criteria in APL development.
- Provision systems were often fragmented and donor-dependent, lacking public-private coordination; no standalone AT policies were identified during APL development.
Conclusions:
- National APLs are substantially influenced by country-specific contexts, including population needs and existing systems.
- Collaborative APL development that prioritizes population needs and local context is essential for effective assistive product access.
- Addressing fragmentation in provision systems and policy development is crucial for strengthening AP service delivery.

