What Is the Best Method for Diagnosing Osteosarcopenic Adiposity in Women After Long-Term Bariatric Surgery? A Comparison and Validation of Different Criteria
- 1Graduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
- 2Graduate Program in Physical Education, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-9000, Brazil.
- 3Faculty of Applied Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13484-350, Brazil.
- 0Graduate Program in Human Nutrition, University of Brasilia, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.The Kelly criterion showed the highest accuracy for diagnosing osteosarcopenic adiposity (OSAd) in women after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. However, all tested criteria had low sensitivity, indicating a need for improved diagnostic methods.
Area Of Science
- Endocrinology
- Bariatric Surgery Outcomes
- Metabolic Health
Background
- Osteosarcopenic adiposity (OSAd) is a concern in post-bariatric surgery patients.
- Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) significantly alters body composition and metabolic health.
- Accurate diagnosis of OSAd is crucial for managing long-term health after RYGB.
Purpose Of The Study
- To compare the diagnostic agreement and discriminant validity of different OSAd criteria in women post-RYGB.
- To assess the prevalence of OSAd using various diagnostic approaches.
- To identify the most accurate criterion for OSAd detection in this specific population.
Main Methods
- Cross-sectional study involving 178 women at least 2 years post-RYGB.
- Evaluated three OSAd diagnostic criteria: Kelly, ESPEN/EASO, and SDOC, combined with WHO osteopenia criteria.
- Assessed agreement using Cohen's Kappa and discriminatory capability via sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy against physical function and fracture risk.
Main Results
- Prevalence of OSAd varied: 2.2% (Kelly), 2.8% (ESPEN/EASO + WHO), and 6.2% (SDOC + WHO).
- Kelly and ESPEN/EASO criteria showed moderate agreement (k=0.658), while Kelly and SDOC had null agreement (k=0.104).
- All criteria demonstrated high specificity (94.0-98.2%) but low sensitivity (0.0-16.7%), with Kelly achieving the highest accuracy (92.7%).
Conclusions
- The Kelly criterion is the most accurate for OSAd diagnosis in post-RYGB women, identifying 2.2% prevalence.
- Existing diagnostic criteria for OSAd exhibit high specificity but critically low sensitivity in this population.
- There is an urgent need for developing more sensitive diagnostic tools for OSAd in women following RYGB surgery.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

