Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Antigenic Liposomes for Generation of Disease-specific Antibodies
Published on: October 25, 2018
Ravulizumab and Efgartigimod in Myasthenia Gravis: A Real-World Study
Frauke Stascheit1, Carla Daiane Ferreira de Sousa1, Annette Aigner1
1From the Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology (F.S., S.L., M.S., M.H., P.D., L.M.G., S.H., A.M.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin; Neuroscience Clinical Research Center (F.S., S.L., M.S., M.H., P.D., L.M.G., S.H., A.M.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin; Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology (C.D.F.S., M.B., C.W.K., L.K., H.W., J.D.L.), University Hospital Münster; Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology (A.A.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Center for Stroke Research Berlin (A.A., M.S., A.M.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Department of Immunology (K.L.), Hellenic Pasteur Institute; and 2nd Neurology Department (J.T.), School of Medicine, "Attikon" University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
Background And Objectives:
Biologics that target pathogenic antibodies (Abs) and their effector functions such as the complement inhibitor ravulizumab and the neonatal Fc receptor agonist efgartigimod have recently been approved for the treatment of acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-Ab-positive myasthenia gravis (MG), but comparative studies are lacking.
Methods:
In a prospective, exploratory real-world study, we assessed clinical efficacy, safety, and biological effects of ravulizumab and efgartigimod treatment initiation. Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scores were used as clinical endpoints. Ab effector functions were determined by AChR-Ab-dependent complement activation and phagocytosis assays and systemic complement activation profiling.
Results:
We observed similar moderate short-term efficacy of ravulizumab and efgartigimod in achieving clinical improvement. Ravulizumab reduced systemic terminal complement activation, but neither treatment showed significant effects on complement pathways proximal to C5 or functional capacities of AChR-Abs. Both treatment modalities were well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported.
Discussion:
Clinical benefits obtained with ravulizumab and efgartigimod can be remarkably heterogeneous in daily clinical practice. Neither treatment relevantly changed effector functions of pathogenic AChR-Abs, supporting the concept that durable disease control in MG requires continuous administration of both fast-acting agents.
Classification Of Evidence:
This study provides Class III evidence that in AChR-Ab-positive patients with generalized MG, ravulizumab and efgartigimod provide comparable modest improvement in MG functional scales.
More Related Videos
05:44A Rapid, Simple, and Standardized Homogenization Method to Prepare Antigen/Adjuvant Emulsions for Inducing Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Published on: December 9, 2022
06:52Behavioral and Locomotor Measurements Using an Open Field Activity Monitoring System for Skeletal Muscle Diseases
Published on: September 29, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Myasthenia Gravis: Overview and Treatment
These antibodies interfere with the function of the nicotinic receptors in three ways: by binding to the receptor and disrupting acetylcholine binding; by causing cross-linking of receptors which...