Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
What Is Normal Growth? Principles, Practicalities and Pitfalls of Growth Assessments in Infants and Children
Tanis R Fenton1, Nicole Gilbert1, Seham Elmrayed1,2
1Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Insights
Accurate child growth assessment requires understanding individual genetic potential, not just population standards. Comprehensive, serial measurements are crucial to avoid misdiagnosing growth faltering and ensure optimal child development.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Growth Monitoring
- Public Health Surveillance
Background:
- Growth assessments are fundamental for public health and clinical care.
- World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards define population norms using z-scores for stunting, wasting, and overweight.
- Existing knowledge gaps challenge accurate individual growth assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review principles for assessing normal growth in children and preterm infants.
- To identify and address pitfalls in current growth assessment practices.
- To define normal individual growth considering genetic potential and environmental factors.
Main Methods:
- Review of principles for assessing normal growth in children and preterm infants.
- Analysis of factors influencing growth (genetics, nutrition, environment, socioeconomic status).
- Discussion of appropriate anthropometric measurement techniques and interpretation.
Main Results:
- Normal growth varies between populations and individuals.
- Individual growth is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors.
- Serial measurements and corrected age are vital for accurate assessment, especially in preterm infants.
Conclusions:
- Normal individual growth is achieving genetic potential through anthropometric progression.
- Misdiagnosis of growth faltering can result from single measurements or uncorrected prematurity.
- Healthcare provider communication regarding child size is critical for parental support and avoiding stigma.
Background:
Growth assessments are a pillar of public health surveillance, individual health screening, and clinical care. Normal growth is defined differently for individuals versus populations. The World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards were developed to describe the pattern of growth in healthy children without socioeconomic limitations whose mothers planned to breastfeed. The growth standards' cut-off points of ±2 standard deviations (z-scores) were defined for population assessments, based on attained size, to describe stunting and wasting at the lower end and overweight at the higher end. In a healthy population, one would expect 2.3% of the population to be above and below these cut-points. Higher child mortality rates associated with higher rates of stunting and wasting noted in observational studies validated these WHO cut-offs. There are knowledge gaps influencing the accuracy and effectiveness of growth assessments in individual children, posing challenges for health care providers.
Summary:
The principles of assessing normal growth in children and preterm infants are reviewed, along with pitfalls to be avoided. Growth is determined by genetics and modified by the interplay with nutritional, environmental, socioeconomic, and possibly intergenerational factors. This complexity is reflected at both the population and individual level. However, normal growth in an individual has unique-specific factors so requires a comprehensive assessment. Normal growth for an individual child could be defined as the progression of changes in anthropometric measurements to achieve the individual's genetic potential. A misdiagnosis of growth faltering can occur if infants and children are assessed with one-time rather than serial measures, and if age is not corrected for prematurity. Health care provider sensitivity and cognizance when communicating about a child's size is important for parental reassurance and avoiding stigma and unnecessary pressures or restrictions around feeding.
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
The Nativist Approach
Information Processing Approach
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Developmental Milestones
A key concept in developmental psychology is...
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...

