Serum and urine nucleic acid screening tests for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients
- Thida Maung Myint 1,2, Chanel H Chong 2, Amy von Huben 2, John Attia 3, Angela C Webster 2,4,5,6, Christopher D Blosser 7, Jonathan C Craig 8,9, Armando Teixeira-Pinto 2, Germaine Wong 2,6
- Thida Maung Myint 1,2, Chanel H Chong 2, Amy von Huben 2
- 1John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
- 2Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- 3University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
- 4NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- 5Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
- 6Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.
- 7Department of Medicine, Nephrology, University of Washington & Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
- 8College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
- 9Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
- 0John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Quantitative nucleic acid testing (QNAT) for BK polyomavirus DNA shows good accuracy for detecting BKPyVAN in kidney transplant recipients. Blood QNAT at 10,000 copies/mL demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity, supporting its use in clinical practice.
Area Of Science
- Nephrology
- Transplant Immunology
- Virology
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background
- BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is a significant complication following kidney transplantation, potentially leading to graft loss.
- Early detection of BKPyVAN is crucial for timely intervention, such as reducing immunosuppression, to preserve graft function.
- Kidney biopsy, the gold standard for BKPyVAN diagnosis, is invasive; thus, non-invasive screening methods like quantitative nucleic acid testing (QNAT) are increasingly utilized.
Purpose Of The Study
- To assess the diagnostic test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of blood and urine QNAT for diagnosing BKPyVAN in transplant recipients.
- To investigate factors influencing diagnostic accuracy, including study types, publication era, viral load thresholds, and assay variability.
Main Methods
- A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, searching multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Cochrane Register) up to June 2023.
- Included studies were cross-sectional or cohort studies evaluating blood/plasma/serum or urine BKPyV QNAT against histopathology as the reference standard.
- Data extraction and quality assessment (QUADAS-2) were performed independently; bivariate random-effects models were used for meta-analysis.
Main Results
- Thirty-one studies with 6559 participants were included, primarily involving kidney transplant recipients.
- Blood BKPyV QNAT at a threshold of 10,000 copies/mL showed pooled sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.78-0.93) and specificity of 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.97).
- Analysis across various thresholds suggested an optimal cut-off around 2000 copies/mL with sensitivity 0.89 and specificity 0.88, though evidence quality was low.
Conclusions
- Blood BKPyV QNAT, particularly at a threshold of 10,000 copies/mL, demonstrates good diagnostic performance for BKPyVAN and aligns with current recommendations.
- Urine BKPyV QNAT lacks sufficient data for reliable accuracy estimation and is not recommended as a primary screening tool.
- Results should be interpreted cautiously due to the low certainty of evidence, potential biases from retrospective studies, and variations in methodology.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

