Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Sampling and Pretreatment of Tooth Enamel Carbonate for Stable Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Analysis
Published on: August 15, 2018
Sampling and collector biases as taphonomic filters: an overview
Francesco Battista1, Cesar L Schultz1
1Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências, Instituto de Geociências, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Sampling bias in paleontology, influenced by human factors and specimen selection, distorts research conclusions. Minimizing information loss from fieldwork to cataloging is crucial for accurate scientific understanding.
Area of Science:
- Paleontology
- Geology
- Ecology
Background:
- Sampling bias is a pervasive issue in scientific research, originating in statistical studies and impacting various disciplines.
- In paleontology, sampling bias is often linked to fieldwork, influenced by human factors (sullegic and trephic) and specimen selection criteria (ugly fossil syndrome).
- Biased samples lead to inaccurate conclusions about target populations and can be viewed as an additional taphonomic filter, introducing artificial results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the significant issue of sampling bias in vertebrate paleontology.
- To discuss the human factors and collection processes that contribute to sampling bias in paleontology.
- To emphasize the need for greater attention to minimize information loss throughout the paleontological data collection and curation pipeline.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on sampling bias in scientific research.
- Analysis of human factors (sullegic, trephic, ugly fossil syndrome) influencing paleontological sampling.
- Examination of the transition points from field collection to museum cataloging (anthroposphere to patrisphere).
Main Results:
- Sampling bias in paleontology is frequently intertwined with collector choices and fieldwork practices.
- Human factors, including collection methods, historical resampling, transport, curation, and specimen selection based on completeness or researcher interest, introduce bias.
- There is a notable lack of discussion regarding sampling bias in vertebrate paleontology compared to other fields, particularly concerning the anthroposphere-patrisphere interface.
Conclusions:
- Sampling bias leads to information loss and artificial results in paleontological research.
- The role of the collector and associated human factors are critical and often indistinguishable from sampling bias.
- Further community attention is required to mitigate sampling bias from field activities through to cataloging to ensure data integrity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Sampling Methods: Overview
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
The Fossil Record
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...

