Hybrid management of aberrant subclavian artery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo elucidate the short- and long-term mortality, morbidity, and endoleak incidences in the hybrid management of aberrant subclavian artery (ASA).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of 99 articles comprising n = 272 cases using PRISMA were supplemented by Cohen's Kappa for assessor consistency. The analysis involved a random-effect model, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals, tests of heterogeneity, and probability. This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023405011).ResultsThe 30-day mortality was 4.6% (95% CI: 1.4%-14.4%) with an overall mortality of 7.3% (95% CI: 2.9%-18.7%) demonstrating a 1.2% increase in mortality per decade of life beyond 60 years. The reported morbidity was 7.6% (95% CI: 3.7%-15.7%) and higher in males albeit higher age (p < .05) (67 vs 59 years). The endoleak incidence stood at 7.8% (95% CI: 3.3%-18.3%) with Type-I the as prominent (48%). Rupture presentation was in 3%, whilst esophageal fistulation (n = 2/3) was associated with morbidity of 66%. Treatment varied, with TEVAR and carotid-subclavian bypass being the most common modality of the choice. The median follow-up was 12 months (IQR, 1-60 months).ConclusionThe observed incidence of mortality, morbidity, and endoleak shows the current role of the hybrid approach in managing ASA. These results emphasize the critical role of detailed surgical planning, combined endovascular and open expertise, and the necessity for a common registry to monitor long-term outcomes.