Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cutting Edge: Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy for Corneal Mechanical Evaluation.

Cornea·2026
Same author

Reply: Global consensus on the evidence-based functional classification of simultaneous vision IOLs.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same author

Opacity Detection on Optical Coherence Tomography Based on an Incidence-Angle and Depth-Dependent Model of Corneal Reflectance.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Comparing the Generalizability of Multiregional versus Locally Trained Deep Learning Models for Trachoma Detection.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

Management of Patient Dissatisfaction After Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens Implantation.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same author

Accuracy of six contemporary toric formulas: Analysis of 6,753 Eyes.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
07:51

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts

Published on: October 21, 2022

1.6K

Thickness Speed Progression Index: Machine Learning Approach for Keratoconus Detection.

Shady T Awwad1, Bassel Hammoud2, Jad F Assaf3

  • 1From the Department of Ophthalmology (S.T.A., B.H., L.A., and C.J.M.), American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

American Journal of Ophthalmology
|November 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary

A new machine learning (ML) index, the Thickness Speed Progression Index, accurately differentiates normal corneas from keratoconus (KC) and keratoconus suspect (KCS) corneas using only pachymetry data.

More Related Videos

Application of Optical Coherence Tomography to a Mouse Model of Retinopathy
08:22

Application of Optical Coherence Tomography to a Mouse Model of Retinopathy

Published on: January 12, 2022

3.9K
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
07:44

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: July 24, 2020

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
07:51

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts

Published on: October 21, 2022

1.6K
Application of Optical Coherence Tomography to a Mouse Model of Retinopathy
08:22

Application of Optical Coherence Tomography to a Mouse Model of Retinopathy

Published on: January 12, 2022

3.9K
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
07:44

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: July 24, 2020

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Technology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive thinning disorder of the cornea.
  • Accurate differentiation of KC, KC suspect (KCS), and normal corneas is crucial for timely intervention.
  • Current diagnostic methods rely on multiple imaging modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a pachymetry-based machine learning (ML) index for differentiating keratoconus, keratoconus suspect, and normal corneas.
  • To assess the diagnostic performance of the ML algorithm using corneal thickness progression data.
  • To establish a novel, potentially simpler, diagnostic tool for corneal ectasias.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study included 349 eyes from 349 patients with normal, KC, or KCS corneas.
  • Six parameters from corneal thickness progression maps (Galilei system) were used to train ML algorithms.
  • The Thickness Speed Progression Index was developed and validated using 5-fold cross-validation and random search over 7 ML algorithms.

Main Results:

  • The Random Forest model achieved 100% accuracy and AUROC of 1.00 in distinguishing normal from KC corneas.
  • In differentiating normal, KCS, and KC corneas, the model achieved 91% overall accuracy with AUROC of 0.93 (normal), 0.83 (KCS), and 0.99 (KC).
  • When including sub-classifications of KCS (topographically/tomographically normal and borderline fellow eyes), accuracy was 87% with specific AUROC values for each group.

Conclusions:

  • Pachymetry-based machine learning algorithms, like the Thickness Speed Progression Index, can effectively discriminate between normal, KC, and KCS corneas.
  • This ML index offers a promising approach for diagnosing corneal ectasias using solely corneal thickness data.
  • The findings suggest a potential for simplified, accurate screening and diagnosis of keratoconus.