Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

06:02
Multi-timescale Microscopy Methods for the Characterization of Fluorescently-labeled Microbubbles for Ultrasound-Triggered Drug Release
Published on: June 12, 2021
3.8K
Polydisperse Versus Monodisperse Microbubbles: A Simulation Study for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
Agisilaos Matalliotakis1, Martin D Verweij2
1Section of Medical Imaging, Department of Imaging Physics, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
|November 29, 2024
Summary
Monodisperse microbubbles (MBs) offer superior contrast enhancement in ultrasound imaging compared to polydisperse MBs. However, these monodisperse MBs also amplify non-linear imaging artifacts, potentially misclassifying them as tissue.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Acoustics
- Biophysics
Background:
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) utilizes microbubbles (MBs) for enhanced vascular visualization and organ perfusion.
- Novel monodisperse MB formulations are being developed to improve upon traditional polydisperse MBs for more consistent imaging outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the contrast enhancement properties of various-sized monodisperse MBs.
- To analyze the influence of monodisperse MBs on non-linear imaging artifacts in CEUS.
- To compare the performance of monodisperse versus polydisperse MBs in simulated ultrasound environments.
Main Methods:
- Numerical simulations using the iterative non-linear contrast source (INCS) method were employed.
- The INCS method realistically simulated ultrasound propagation in both monodisperse and polydisperse MB populations.
- Individual bubble properties and multiple scattering effects were considered in the simulations.
Main Results:
- Scattering from resonant monodisperse MBs was 11.8 dB stronger than from polydisperse MBs.
- Non-linear imaging artifacts downstream of monodisperse MBs were 19.4 dB stronger compared to polydisperse suspensions.
- Monodisperse MBs demonstrated a higher signal-to-noise ratio.
Conclusions:
- Monodisperse MBs are more effective contrast agents in CEUS, particularly at resonance.
- Enhanced non-linear wave propagation artifacts occur with monodisperse MBs.
- These artifacts can lead to misclassification of MBs as tissue in CEUS imaging.

