Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025
Walk with Me Hybrid Virtual/In-Person Walking for Older Adults with Neurodegenerative Disease
Published on: June 16, 2023
Virtual Assessment Protocols for Timed-Up-and-Go, 5-Repetition Chair Rise, and 1-Minute Sit-to-Stand Tests in
Stephanie Saunders1, Julie Reid1, Ava Mehdipour1
1School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Objective:
To develop and evaluate virtual assessment protocols for the Timed-Up-and-Go usual and fast pace, Chair Rise-5 repetition, and the 1-minute Sit-to-Stand tests and examine their feasibility, reliability, and validity.
Design:
This was a prospective cohort study, where participants engaged in up to 2 virtual assessments and data were collected prospectively for 1 year.
Setting:
Assessments took place in participants' homes in the community. Toolkits were delivered that included the required equipment and internet-enabled tablet.
Participants:
Participants included a random sample of adults ≥65 years old who could walk 10 m without assistance from another person and communicate in English.
Main Outcome Measures:
Falls and health care utilization data were collected for 1 year after initial assessments. Descriptive data were used to examine feasibility; intraclass correlation (ICC), and Pearson's/Spearman's correlation and areas under the curve (AUCs) were used to evaluate reliability and validity, respectively.
Results:
Sixty participants (mean age 76.6±5.6; 55% female) completed visit 1 and 52 completed visit 2. Technology issues were relatively common, yet no safety incidents occurred. All the virtual mobility tests demonstrated excellent test-retest (ICCs=0.86-0.95) and inter-rater (ICC=0.98-0.99) reliability. The tests had weak-to-moderate correlations with measures of physical function (r=-0.14 to -0.43) and physical activity (r=-0.19 to 0.32). Fifty-seven total falls were recorded by 28 participants (46%) over 1 year. The virtual mobility tests did not have adequate accuracy for predicting falls (AUCs=0.53-0.59), specialist (AUCs=0.48-0.60), family doctor (AUCs=0.48-0.59), or rehabilitation professional visits (AUCs=0.65-0.67), or hospitalizations (AUCs=0.56-0.63).
Conclusion:
Results support the feasibility and reliability of virtual administration of the Timed-Up-and-Go usual and fast pace, Chair Rise-5 repitition, and 1-minute Sit-to-Stand tests. Clinicians and researchers can use the included manuals to conduct these tests virtually. Future research should examine the clinical utility of these tests for remote monitoring and mobility assessment.
