Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
Evaluating coarse PM composition and sources based on bulk and molecular speciation of PM2.5 and PM10 in Nanjing,
Wangnan Cui1, Zishu Wang2, Wei Feng1
1Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Abstract:
To understand the differences in the composition and sources of PM2.5 and PM10 caused by coarse particles, integrated PM2.5 and PM10 samples were synchronously collected in Nanjing, East China, in summer 2020 and winter 2020/2021. Bulk and molecular speciation and light absorption measurements of aerosol extracts were performed, followed by positive matrix factorization (PMF) based on the PM2.5 and PM10 data sets, respectively. The difference in average concentrations of total bulk species between PM2.5 and PM10 was mainly caused by the distribution of considerable NO3-, SO42-, Ca2+, and organic carbon (OC) in coarse particles. Coarse PM influenced by abrasion products from tire wear and leaves contributed about half of the low-volatility n-alkanes in summer. The contribution of coarse PM to biomass burning tracers and water-soluble OC increased in winter when biomass combustion was excessively active. More than 70% of sugar polyols were attributable to coarse PM in summer, and biomass burning could be an important source in winter. The light-absorbing organic chromophores were almost entirely associated with PM2.5, but water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) exhibited stronger light absorption in PM10 extracts than in PM2.5 extracts possibly due to the influence of coarse PM on pH. PMF analysis indicated that biomass burning, aqueous-phase reactions, and processed dust were the main contributors of organic matter and its light absorption in winter. Biogenic primary and secondary sources made discernable contributions only in summer. The differences between PM2.5 and PM10 were likely attributed to mixing of crustal dust, combustion particles, and surface reactions.
More Related Videos
12:15Quantification of three DNA Lesions by Mass Spectrometry and Assessment of Their Levels in Tissues of Mice Exposed to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter
Published on: May 29, 2019
14:10Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
Published on: March 21, 2025