Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Completion Rate and Satisfaction With Online Computer-Assisted History Taking Questionnaires in Orthopedics:
Casper Craamer1,2, Thomas Timmers1,2, Michiel Siebelt3
1Research and Development Department, Interactive Studios, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
Background:
Collecting the medical history during a first outpatient consultation plays an important role in making a diagnosis. However, it is a time-consuming process, and time is scarce in today's health care environment. The computer-assisted history taking (CAHT) systems allow patients to share their medical history electronically before their visit. Although multiple advantages of CAHT have been demonstrated, adoption in everyday medical practice remains low, which has been attributed to various barriers.
Objective:
This study aimed to implement a CAHT questionnaire for orthopedic patients in preparation for their first outpatient consultation and analyze its completion rate and added value.
Methods:
A multicenter implementation study was conducted in which all patients who were referred to the orthopedic department were invited to self-complete the CAHT questionnaire. The primary outcome of the study is the completion rate of the questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included patient and physician satisfaction. These were assessed via surveys and semistructured interviews.
Unlabelled:
In total, 5321 patients were invited, and 4932 (92.7%) fully completed the CAHT questionnaire between April 2022 and July 2022. On average, participants (n=224) rated the easiness of completing the questionnaire at 8.0 (SD 1.9; 0-10 scale) and the satisfaction of the consult at 8.0 (SD 1.7; 0-10 scale). Satisfaction with the outpatient consultation was higher in cases where the given answers were used by the orthopedic surgeon during this consultation (median 8.3, IQR 8.0-9.1 vs median 8.0, IQR 7.0-8.5; P<.001). Physicians (n=15) scored the average added value as 7.8 (SD 1.7; 0-10 scale) and unanimously recognized increased efficiency, better patient engagement, and better medical record completeness. Implementing the patient's answers into the electronic health record was deemed necessary.
Conclusions:
In this study, we have shown that previously recognized barriers to implementing and adapting CAHT can now be effectively overcome. We demonstrated that almost all patients completed the CAHT questionnaire. This results in reported improvements in both the efficiency and personalization of outpatient consultations. Given the pressing need for personalized health care delivery in today's time-constrained medical environment, we recommend implementing CAHT systems in routine medical practice.
