Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

5.9K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
5.9K
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay02:27

Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay

10.5K
The Upf proteins that carry out nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) are found in all eukaryotic organisms, including humans. Each protein has an individual role, but they need to work in collaboration. Upf1 is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that unwinds the RNA helix. Because Upf1 can unwind any RNA, Upf2 and Upf3 are required to help Upf1 discriminate between nonsense and normal mRNAs.
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
10.5K
Nucleic Acids02:43

Nucleic Acids

43.7K
Nucleic acids are the most important macromolecules for the continuity of life. They carry the cell's genetic blueprint and carry instructions for its functioning.
DNA and RNA
The two main types of nucleic acids are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). DNA is the genetic material in all living organisms, ranging from single-celled bacteria to multicellular mammals. It is in the nucleus of eukaryotes and in the organelles, chloroplasts, and mitochondria. In prokaryotes,...
43.7K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

9.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
9.0K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

33.3K
Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
33.3K
Types of RNA01:23

Types of RNA

63.2K
Overview
Three main types of RNA are involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These RNAs perform diverse functions and can be broadly classified as protein-coding or non-coding RNA. Non-coding RNAs play important roles in the regulation of gene expression in response to developmental and environmental changes. Non-coding RNAs in prokaryotes can be manipulated to develop more effective antibacterial drugs for human or animal use.
RNA...
63.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Socio-Demographic, Environmental, and Self-Mediated Aural Practices Determinants of Aural Health in Urban Slums of Bhubaneswar, India: A multivariable Analysis to Suggest Recommendations.

Noise & health·2026
Same author

Cryptic RNA binding sites are energetically accessible and chemically addressable.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Microwave-assisted thermal profiling of blood: a potential biomarker for differentiating cancer and non-cancer states.

Journal of medical engineering & technology·2026
Same author

3dDNAi: An Integrated Approach for 3D Structure Prediction of Single-Stranded DNAs.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Structural and Functional Disruption of Thiopurine S‑Methyltransferase by the A80P Variant: A Simulation and Genotyping Study.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

hexABC seeking the physical code of DNA.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 6, 2025

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

31.4K

RNA-Puzzles Round V: blind predictions of 23 RNA structures.

Fan Bu1,2, Yagoub Adam3,4, Ryszard W Adamiak5,6

  • 1GMU-GIBH Joint School of Life Sciences, The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Cell Fate Regulation and Diseases, Guangzhou National Laboratory, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Nature Methods
|December 2, 2024
PubMed
Summary

RNA-Puzzles advances RNA 3D structure prediction by comparing 18 groups' models against experimental data. Key challenges include accurate pairing, stacking, and avoiding entanglements for improved RNA modeling.

More Related Videos

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.0K
Identification of Footprints of RNA:Protein Complexes via RNA Immunoprecipitation in Tandem Followed by Sequencing RIPiT-Seq
09:26

Identification of Footprints of RNA:Protein Complexes via RNA Immunoprecipitation in Tandem Followed by Sequencing RIPiT-Seq

Published on: July 10, 2019

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 6, 2025

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

31.4K
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.0K
Identification of Footprints of RNA:Protein Complexes via RNA Immunoprecipitation in Tandem Followed by Sequencing RIPiT-Seq
09:26

Identification of Footprints of RNA:Protein Complexes via RNA Immunoprecipitation in Tandem Followed by Sequencing RIPiT-Seq

Published on: July 10, 2019

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • RNA three-dimensional structure prediction is crucial for understanding RNA function.
  • The RNA-Puzzles initiative facilitates community-driven progress in RNA structure modeling.
  • Experimental RNA structures are often preceded by computational predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of computational RNA structure prediction methods.
  • To identify key challenges and areas for improvement in RNA modeling.
  • To compare the performance of different modeling groups on a diverse set of RNA structures.

Main Methods:

  • A large-scale prediction set involving 18 modeling groups for 23 diverse RNA targets (elements, aptamers, viral RNAs, ribozymes, riboswitches).
  • Development and application of automatic assessment protocols for comparing predicted structures with experimental data.
  • Analysis of prediction accuracy focusing on specific structural features like base pairing, coaxial stacking, and entanglement.

Main Results:

  • Performance evaluation across 23 RNA-Puzzles, encompassing various RNA types.
  • Identification of critical steps for accurate RNA structure modeling: helix-forming pair identification, non-Watson-Crick module recognition, coaxial stacking, and entanglement avoidance.
  • Top-performing groups in RNA-Puzzles also demonstrated high performance in the CASP15 contest.

Conclusions:

  • The RNA-Puzzles study highlights specific areas requiring methodological advancements for precise RNA 3D structure prediction.
  • Accurate modeling of RNA structures necessitates overcoming challenges in identifying base pairs, non-canonical interactions, and helix stacking.
  • The success of top groups underscores the importance of robust algorithms and accurate feature identification in computational RNA structure prediction.