Evaluating the Research Productivity in Pulpotomy: A Bibliometric Analysis
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Bibliometric analysis of pulpotomy research from 2000-2023 reveals a surge in publications since 2012. While Level of Evidence IV is common, Level I studies attract more citations, indicating research advancement.
Area Of Science
- Dental research
- Bibliometrics
- Oral health
Background
- Pulpotomy is a crucial dental procedure for preserving pulp vitality.
- Understanding research trends in pulpotomy is essential for guiding future studies.
Purpose Of The Study
- To conduct a bibliometric analysis of pulpotomy research published between 2000 and 2023.
- To identify trends in publication, citation, evidence levels, and key contributors.
Main Methods
- Data sourced from the Web of Science database using keywords related to pulpotomy and pulp exposure.
- Bibliometric indicators analyzed include publication types, growth, citations, evidence levels, and geographical distribution.
- MS Excel, VOSviewer, and R software were used for data analysis.
Main Results
- A total of 738 documents were identified, published in 213 sources by 3,017 authors from 75 countries.
- Research output showed fluctuated growth, with a significant increase (82.12%) in the latter half (2012-2023).
- India, Brazil, and the United States were the leading contributing countries, while Level I studies received the highest average citations despite Level IV being most common.
Conclusions
- The significant increase in pulpotomy research since 2012 suggests advancements in oral health education and research infrastructure.
- Further investigation into high-impact Level I studies is warranted to enhance clinical practice and understanding of pulpotomy outcomes.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.