Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness.
Suja S Rajan1, Jose-Miguel Yamal2, Mengxi Wang2
1Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Mobile stroke units (MSUs) show borderline cost-effectiveness for all ischemic stroke patients initially. However, MSUs become highly cost-effective for patients without prior disability, considering lifetime costs and stroke-related expenses.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Health Economics
- Emergency Medical Services
Background:
- Ischemic stroke presents a significant disease and financial burden.
- Timely administration of thrombolytics is crucial for effective stroke management.
- Evaluating novel approaches like Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) for stroke treatment is critical.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) compared to standard Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for expediting tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration.
- To analyze one-year and lifetime cost-effectiveness using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) method.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multicenter, alternating-week, cluster-controlled trial comparing MSU and EMS.
- Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) estimated via EQ-5D-5L data served as the primary effectiveness measure.
- Cost analysis based on Medicare reimbursements, including calculations excluding pre-existing disability and limited to stroke-related costs.
Main Results:
- First-year ICERs were $238,873/QALY for all tPA-eligible patients and $61,199/QALY for those without pre-existing disability.
- Lifetime ICERs were $94,710/QALY for all patients and $31,259/QALY for those without pre-existing disability.
- ICERs decreased when restricted to stroke-related costs and were influenced by annual patient treatment volume per MSU.
Conclusions:
- MSUs demonstrate borderline cost-effectiveness for all tPA-eligible patients within the first year, considering total costs.
- MSUs are cost-effective to highly cost-effective for patients without pre-existing disability, over a lifetime horizon, and when focusing on stroke-related costs.
- The cost-effectiveness of MSUs is significantly dependent on patient volume and specific cost parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Energy Losses in Transformers
There are four main reasons for energy losses in transformers.
The first cause can be the high resistance of the copper windings...
Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines
However, in reality, no machine can be truly ideal, and all of them experience some...
Mesh Analysis for AC Circuits
The process of harmonizing these impedances begins with a clear understanding of the input and output signals. Once these signals are known, the...
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Design of Transmission Shafts - Stress Analysis
Multimachine Stability
In analyzing the system, the nodal equations represent the relationship between bus voltages, machine voltages, and machine currents. The nodal equation is given by:

