Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 6, 2025

Assessment of Global DNA Double-Strand End Resection using BrdU-DNA Labeling coupled with Cell Cycle Discrimination Imaging
Published on: April 28, 2021
Phase II Trial of the PARP Inhibitor, Niraparib, in BAP1 and Other DNA Damage Response Pathway-Deficient Neoplasms
Thomas J George1,2, Ji-Hyun Lee2,3, David L DeRemer2,4
1Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Purpose:
BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a critical cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR) regulator with mutations (mBAP1) causing a functional protein loss. PARP inhibitors (PARPis) demonstrate synthetic lethality in mBAP1 preclinical models, independent of underlying BRCA status. This study aimed to explore the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.
Methods:
This was a phase II multicenter trial in which refractory solid tumor patients were assigned to cohort A (histology-specific tumors likely to harbor mBAP1) or cohort B (histology-agnostic tumors with other known non-BRCA-confirmed DDR mutations). All patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily on a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate, and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.
Results:
From August 2018 through December 2021, 37 patients were enrolled with 31 evaluable for response (cohort A, n = 18; cohort B, n = 13). In cohort A, the best response was one partial response (PR; 6%), eight stable disease (SD; 44%), and nine progressive disease (PD; 50%). This cohort stopped at the first stage following the prespecified Simon's design. mBAP1 was confirmed in 7/9 patients (78%) with PR or SD but in only 3/9 (33%) in those with PD. The median PFS in patients with mBAP1 (n = 10) was 6.7 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 9.2) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) for wild-type (n = 8; P = .020). In cohort B, the best response was six SD (46%) and seven PD (54%), with SD in those with ATM, CHEK2, PTEN, RAD50, and ARID1A mutations.
Conclusion:
Niraparib failed to meet the prespecified efficacy end point for response. However, clinical benefit was suggested in a proportion of patients who had a confirmed mBAP1, supporting further investigation.
Insights
Niraparib showed limited response in advanced solid tumors, but suggested clinical benefit in patients with BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) mutations. Further investigation is warranted for this patient subgroup.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) is a key regulator of the cell cycle and DNA damage response (DDR).
- Mutations in BAP1 (mBAP1) lead to functional protein loss.
- PARP inhibitors (PARPis) show synthetic lethality in preclinical mBAP1 models, irrespective of BRCA status.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical activity of niraparib in patients with advanced tumors likely to harbor mBAP1.
- To assess response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A phase II multicenter trial involving patients with refractory solid tumors.
- Patients were assigned to cohort A (tumors likely to harbor mBAP1) or cohort B (other non-BRCA DDR mutations).
- Niraparib 300 mg was administered orally once daily; primary endpoint was objective response rate.
Main Results:
- 37 patients enrolled; 31 evaluable. Cohort A (n=18) showed one partial response (6%), eight stable disease (44%), and nine progressive disease (50%).
- mBAP1 was confirmed in 78% of patients with PR/SD but only 33% with PD in cohort A.
- Median PFS was 6.7 months for mBAP1 patients vs. 1.8 months for wild-type (P=.020). Cohort B showed six SD (46%) and seven PD (54%).
Conclusions:
- Niraparib did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint for response in this trial.
- A clinical benefit was suggested in a subset of patients with confirmed mBAP1.
- Further investigation of niraparib in mBAP1-mutated tumors is supported.
Related Concept Videos
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
Long-patch Base Excision Repair
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle

