Performance of Pediatric Index of Mortality PIM-3 in a Tertiary Care PICU in India

Nisha Toteja1, Bharat Choudhary2, Daisy Khera3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

PubMed

Insights

The Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM-3) score shows strong predictive ability for mortality in pediatric intensive care units. However, its calibration was poor in a developing country

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric critical care medicine
  • Health services research
  • Clinical epidemiology

Background:

  • The Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM-3) is a widely used scoring system for pediatric intensive care.
  • Concerns exist regarding PIM-3's utility in resource-limited settings.
  • Region-specific data are needed to assess PIM-3 performance across diverse populations and healthcare constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of the PIM-3 score in predicting mortality.
  • To assess PIM-3's accuracy in a tertiary care Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in a developing country.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study including children aged 1 month to 18 years admitted to the PICU.
  • Data collected included demographics, disease profiles, comorbidities, PIM-3 scores, and outcomes.
  • Statistical analysis involved Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curves for discrimination and Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) with Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit for calibration.

Main Results:

  • A total of 282 children were included, with 62 (21.9%) deaths.
  • The PIM-3 score demonstrated excellent discrimination with an AUROC of 0.961.
  • However, the PIM-3 score exhibited poor calibration, as indicated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ² = 11.7, p < 0.05) and an SMR of 1.28.

Conclusions:

  • The PIM-3 score possesses strong discriminatory power for predicting mortality in this PICU.
  • Despite good discrimination, the PIM-3 score showed poor calibration in the context of a developing country's tertiary care PICU.
  • Further research may be needed to refine or adapt scoring systems for resource-limited settings.

Related Concept Videos

Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment01:30

Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment

Pneumonia poses the potential for numerous complications that warrant consideration. These complications include the following:
165
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
914
Pneumonia IV: Management01:28

Pneumonia IV: Management

The treatment of pneumonia varies based on its severity and the causative pathogen. Here is a structured approach to managing pneumonia, integrating pharmaceutical and supportive care strategies.
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
299
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.3K