A Comparison of the 2022 Versus 2011 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Web-Based Risk

Mitchell Kinkor1, Jake Schneider2, Farhath Sulthana3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.

Insights

The 2022 and 2011 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development estimators show similar accuracy in predicting infants needing steroid treatment for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). However, both have limited accuracy in predicting death or severe BPD.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Respiratory Medicine
  • Pediatric Critical Care

Background:

  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a significant complication in preterm infants.
  • Accurate identification of infants at high risk for BPD is crucial for timely intervention.
  • The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) has developed estimators to predict BPD risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive accuracy of the 2022 NICHD estimator versus the 2011 NICHD estimator.
  • To evaluate the performance of these estimators in identifying infants at high risk for BPD.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective single-center study included infants born at ≤28 weeks' gestation.
  • Demographic and respiratory support data were used to calculate BPD risk using both estimators.
  • Predictive accuracy was assessed using c-statistics and area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC).
  • Outcomes included systemic steroid treatment for BPD and a composite of death or severe BPD.

Main Results:

  • Both the 2022 and 2011 BPD estimators demonstrated good-to-excellent accuracy (c-statistics 0.77–0.89) for predicting steroid treatment.
  • Predictive accuracy for steroid treatment was similar between the two estimators.
  • Both estimators showed poor AUC for predicting death or highest severity of BPD, with the 2022 estimator having acceptable AUC (0.773) for this outcome on day 28 of life.

Conclusions:

  • The 2022 and 2011 NICHD BPD estimators exhibit comparable good-to-excellent accuracy for predicting the need for steroid treatment.
  • Both estimators have poor-to-fair accuracy in predicting the composite outcome of death or severe BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children01:29

Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

Pediatric patient dosages diverge from adults due to disparities in body surface area, total body water, and extracellular fluid per kilogram of body weight. The dosing regimen considers the variations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacology across distinct age groups, encompassing preterm newborns, infants, young children, older children, and adolescents. Calculation of pediatric patient doses is predicated on determining body surface area, which exhibits a superior correlation with the child's...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...