Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0
Barbara Van Der Pol1, Ann Avery2, Stephanie N Taylor3
1From the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL.
Background:
Given the continued increases in rates of both Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection, additional diagnostic assays may be useful in increasing access to testing for these sexually transmitted infections. We evaluated the performance of the NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0 on the NeuMoDx-96 and NeuMoDx-288 Molecular Systems.
Methods:
The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the assay were assessed when used with (1) endocervical swabs, (2) self- and clinician-collected vaginal swabs, and (3) first-catch urine specimens (female and male). Results were compared with a patient infection status based on US Food and Drug Administration-cleared assays.
Results:
The NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0 demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants. All specimen types other than endocervical swabs had ≥95% sensitivity and >99% specificity for both pathogens. For endocervical samples, sensitivities were 93.2% and 93.3% for CT and NG, respectively. There was no difference in performance based on platform. The frequency of invalid results was low (<1%).
Conclusions:
The NeuMoDx CT/NG Assay 2.0 demonstrated performance similar to currently US Food and Drug Administration-cleared assays, with the added choice of a moderate- (96-sample) or a high-throughput (288-sample) platform. The system therefore offers solutions to laboratories running lower volumes of testing that may obviate the need for outsourcing to larger reference laboratories.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET

