Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Determining the Contribution of the Energy Systems During Exercise
Published on: March 20, 2012
An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective on Athletic Development and Performance: Differences Between Proximate and
Joseph Baker1, Kathryn Johnston2
1Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 55 Harbord St., Toronto, ON, M5S 2W6, Canada. joseph.baker@utoronto.ca.
None:
Many areas of mainstream psychology have embraced the notions that understanding human behaviour can be improved by integrating developments from evolutionary science; however, evolutionary principles have not been as widely applied among sport researchers or practitioners, especially those examining athlete development and the psychology of competition and performance. In this paper, we discuss the distinction between ultimate and proximate explanations of psychological outcomes, and the relevance of this distinction for exploring issues related to skill acquisition and athlete development. We use three examples-deliberate practice, early sport play and sustained engagement-to highlight the benefits and challenges of applying evolutionary theories to sport contexts. Embracing our species' evolutionary history has the potential to inform ongoing debates in athlete development and performance, among other areas of sport science.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Psychology
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Natural Selection and Adaptation
Beyond physical adaptations,...
Optimal Arousal Theory
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Functionalism
James envisioned psychology's...
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...

