Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes
Published on: December 13, 2016
A framework for fused deposition modelling process evaluation using multivariate process capability analysis.
Moath Alatefi1, Abdulrahman M Al-Ahmari1, Abdullah Yahia AlFaify1
1Industrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
This study introduces a multivariate process capability index (MPCI) to evaluate additive manufacturing (AM) processes, specifically Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Results show the FDM process is incapable with standard specifications, requiring adjustments for improved quality control.
Area of Science:
- Manufacturing Engineering
- Quality Control
- Materials Science
Background:
- Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes require continuous improvement for advanced applications.
- Evaluating AM process outputs against specifications is crucial for quality assurance.
- Univariate process capability indices can be misleading for AM's multi-correlated quality characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a general methodological framework for evaluating AM processes using a multivariate process capability index (MPCI).
- To assess the capability of the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) process using the developed MPCI framework.
- To identify areas for improvement in AM processes based on variation analysis.
Main Methods:
- Developed a methodological framework for AM process evaluation using MPCI.
- Selected Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) as the investigation case.
- Established specification limits for critical quality characteristics (QCs).
- Examined QC data for normality, stability, and correlation to meet MPCI assumptions.
- Estimated MPCI via large sample simulation and calculated percent of nonconforming (PNC).
- Conducted sensitivity analysis of the FDM process and identified assignable causes of variation.
Main Results:
- The FDM process mean is shifted for all QCs, with part diameter exhibiting the most variation.
- Process data were not normally distributed; a transformation algorithm effectively reduced skewness.
- The FDM process was found incapable with most specification limits, except for very coarse tolerances.
- Sensitivity analysis provided insights into process performance under varying conditions.
Conclusions:
- The proposed MPCI framework offers a robust method for evaluating complex AM processes.
- The FDM process requires significant improvements to meet typical manufacturing specifications.
- Understanding data distribution and variation is key to effective AM process control and enhancement.
Related Concept Videos
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Multicompartment Models: Overview
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Introduction to Statistical Process Control
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...

