Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
Effectiveness of Organ Preservation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Complete Clinical Response After
Kaibo Ouyang1,2, Zifeng Yang2, Yuesheng Yang1,2
1Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery is the common treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Presently, for patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, organ preservation ("watch-and-wait" and local excision strategies) has been increasingly favored. However, the optimal treatment for patients with complete clinical response remains unclear.
Objective:
This study aimed to use Bayesian meta-analysis to determine the best treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response among radical surgery, local excision, and watch-and-wait strategies.
Data Sources:
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase (Ovid) databases were searched for literature published through December 31, 2023.
Study Selection:
Studies that compared 2 or more treatments for patients with complete clinical response were included.
Intervention:
The analysis was completed via Bayesian meta-analysis using a random-effects model.
Main Outcome Measures:
Surgery-related complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates.
Results:
Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria. The watch-and-wait group and local excision group exhibited a higher rate of tumor recurrence compared to the radical surgery group (watch-and-wait vs radical surgery: OR, 9.10 [95% CI, 3.30-32.3]; local excision vs radical surgery: OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.05-9.95]). The distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates of the 3 treatments were not statistically different. The radical surgery group had the most number of stomas and had the greatest risk of morbidity than the watch-and-wait group (watch-and-wait vs radical surgery: OR, 0.00 [95% CI, 0.00-0.12]).
Limitations:
The study included only 1 randomized controlled trial compared to 10 observational studies, which could affect overall quality. Funnel plots of disease-free survival rates and stoma suggest significant publication bias among studies that compared radical surgery with the watch-and-wait strategy.
Conclusions:
The watch-and-wait strategy could be optimal for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
