Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Integrating Alveolar-Capillary Reserve Measurements in Exercise Adaptation and Therapeutic Strategies
Published on: February 2, 2024
Physiological Assessment of ECCO2R on the Work of Breathing in Exacerbations of COPD
Nicholas A Barrett1,2, Francesco Murgolo3, Salvatore Grasso3
1Department of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Rationale:
The impact of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) on work of breathing and aeration in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is poorly understood.
Objectives:
The study explores the impact of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and ECCO2R on respiratory drive, effort and distribution of ventilation in AECOPD.
Methods:
Patients enrolled in a randomised controlled study of the addition of ECCO2R to NIV compared with NIV underwent oesophageal pressure measurement, electrical impedance tomography and parasternal electromyography.
Measurements And Main Results:
18 patients were enrolled, nine in each arm. Of these, eight in the NIV arm and seven in the ECCO2R arm underwent physiological assessment. Patients randomised to ECCO2R, had a period of NIV combined with ECCO2R and, after removal of NIV, a period of ECCO2R alone. The removal of NIV whilst remaining on ECCO2R resulted in a respiratory acidosis (pH 7.34 (7.31-7.34) vs. 7.31 (7.31-7.34), p < 0.0001), increased work of breathing (7.43 (6.08-10.19) vs. 11.1 (8.11-15.15) J/min, p < 0.0001) and increased neural drive (884.4 (684.7-967.3) vs. 1321.1 (903.3-1575.3) AU, p = 0.0005). On day 1, the work of breathing was lower in the NIV than the ECCO2R group (4.38 (2.76-7.27) vs. 8.03 (4.8-15.94) J/min, p < 0.0001), minute ventilation was higher (15.54 (13.14-18.48) vs. 12.24 (8.51-13.9) L/min, p < 0.0001) and neural drive was the same (1,163.8 (1,085.5-1,325.5) vs. 1,093.8 (885.7-1,258.7) AU, p = 0.5556).
Conclusions:
The combination of NIV and ECCO2R results in lower work of breathing and improved neuro-ventilatory coupling. NIV fully supports ventilation early whilst ECCO2R improves neuro-ventilatory coupling and work of breathing over time.
Trial Registration:
Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02086084; registered 1 December 2015; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02086084?cond=copd&term=ecco2r&rank=4.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:

