Paying to publish: A cross-sectional analysis of article processing charges and journal characteristics among 87

Landon M Clark1, Dayle K Wang1, Brian D Adkins2

  • 1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

Academic Pathology
|December 6, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Pathology journal article processing charges are higher in hybrid models than open access models. Factors like impact factor and publisher influence these fees, while open access and society affiliation may lower them.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical publishing
  • Scholarly communication
  • Pathology research

Background:

  • Article processing charges (APCs) are common for open access publishing.
  • APCs can present financial barriers for early career researchers.
  • Pathology journal APCs have not been previously quantified.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the article processing charges in pathology journals.
  • To identify factors associated with these charges.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional analysis of 87 pathology journals listed in Journal Citation Reports.
  • Data collected included publication model, impact factor, journal location, publisher, society affiliation, and subscription costs.
  • Statistical analysis (bivariate and multivariable) was used to identify associations.

Main Results:

  • Most pathology journals (70.1%) are hybrid; 29.9% are open access.
  • Median APCs were significantly higher for hybrid journals ($3710) than open access journals ($1735).
  • Higher APCs correlated with higher impact factors and institutional subscription costs. Open access, European location (ex-UK), and medical society affiliation correlated with lower APCs.

Conclusions:

  • Hybrid pathology journals present higher publication fees than dedicated open access journals.
  • Understanding APCs is vital for ensuring equitable opportunities for pathologists in academic publishing.
  • Factors such as journal model, impact factor, and publisher significantly influence APCs.