Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Establishment of Zebrafish Patient-Derived Xenografts from Pancreatic Cancer for Chemosensitivity Testing
Published on: May 12, 2023
PFOS and Its Commercial Alternative, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, Induce Multidrug Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer
Jiawei Hong1,2,3, Keyi Du1,2,3, Weichen Zhang1,2,3
1Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, PR China.
Abstract:
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), specifically perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and its alternative, 2-[(6-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6-dodecafluorohexyl)oxy]-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethanesulfonic acid (6:2 Cl-PFESA), are associated with environmental health concerns and potential cancer progression. However, their impact on multidrug resistance (MDR) in pancreatic cancer (PC) chemotherapy remains unclear. Here, we employed drug-sensitivity assays, including IC50 calculations, in vitro and in vivo models with various chemotherapeutics, and paclitaxel (PTX) as a representative agent, combined with transcriptomic/proteomic sequencing and clinical prognostic analysis, to identify MDR-related genes and validate their relevance, with the objective of establishing the correlation between PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure and MDR in PC at molecular, cellular, and animal model levels. Our findings demonstrate that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure increases the drug IC50 in three different PC cell lines for various chemotherapeutic agents. Compared with PFOS, 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrated a more pro-MDR effect on PC cells in vitro. In vivo experiments further revealed that PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposures significantly reduced the efficacy of PTX in PC, with inhibition rates dropping from 78.3% to 23.8%/6.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). This effect was driven by the aberrant activation of the PI3K-ABCB1 pathway, with 6:2 Cl-PFESA demonstrating a stronger capacity to promote this signal pathway's expression and function compared with PFOS. These data suggest that exposure to PFAS may elevate the risk of MDR and subsequent disease progression. Although marketed as a safer alternative to PFOS, the notable impact of 6:2 Cl-PFESA on MDR highlights the necessity for a comprehensive assessment of its potential carcinogenic risks.

