Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

06:59
Establishment of Zebrafish Patient-Derived Xenografts from Pancreatic Cancer for Chemosensitivity Testing
Published on: May 12, 2023
1.1K
PFOS and Its Commercial Alternative, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, Induce Multidrug Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer
Jiawei Hong1,2,3, Keyi Du1,2,3, Weichen Zhang1,2,3
1Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, PR China.
Environmental Science & Technology
|December 7, 2024
Summary
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) like PFOS and 6:2 Cl-PFESA increase pancreatic cancer
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Oncology
- Toxicology
Background:
- Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), including perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and its alternative 6:2 Cl-PFESA, are linked to health concerns.
- The impact of PFAS on multidrug resistance (MDR) in pancreatic cancer (PC) chemotherapy is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure and MDR in pancreatic cancer.
- To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying PFAS-induced MDR in PC.
Main Methods:
- Utilized drug-sensitivity assays (IC50), in vitro/in vivo PC models, and paclitaxel (PTX) as a representative chemotherapeutic.
- Employed transcriptomic/proteomic sequencing and clinical prognostic analysis to identify MDR-related genes.
- Assessed the activation of the PI3K-ABCB1 pathway.
Main Results:
- PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA exposure increased drug IC50 values in PC cell lines.
- 6:2 Cl-PFESA exhibited a stronger pro-MDR effect than PFOS in vitro.
- PFAS exposure significantly reduced PTX efficacy in vivo and activated the PI3K-ABCB1 pathway, with 6:2 Cl-PFESA showing greater potency.
Conclusions:
- PFAS exposure may increase pancreatic cancer MDR and disease progression risk.
- The alternative PFAS, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, demonstrates significant MDR-promoting effects, necessitating comprehensive risk assessment.
- Findings highlight the need to evaluate the carcinogenic potential and MDR-inducing properties of PFAS alternatives.

