Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Universal Teacher-Child Interaction Training in early childhood special education: Identifying mechanisms of action
W Andrew Rothenberg1, Ellyn Schmidt2, Bridget Davidson2
1University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Mailman Center for Child Development, 1600 NW 12 Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA; Duke University Center for Child and Family Policy, 302 Towerview Rd, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Abstract:
Teacher-Child Interaction Training-Universal (TCIT-U) is effective for increasing teachers' use of strategies that promote positive child behavior; however, the exact mechanisms of change are unknown. Using a cluster randomized control trial in a sample of 410 racially- and ethnically-diverse children (Mage = 41.73 months; 50% White, 45% Black/African-American, 4% Multiracial, 1% Asian; 59% Hispanic; 87% with disabilities) taught by 102 teachers from 38 classrooms in eight schools, we attempted to identify these mechanisms of action. Results identified two mechanisms of action by which TCIT-U worked to benefit children in this sample. Enrollment in TCIT-U helped teachers learn to provide labeled praise for child behaviors (as measured by observer ratings) and appropriately follow through on commands (as measured by observer ratings) they issued, which subsequently caused children to experience better socioemotional functioning (as measured by on the teacher-reported Devereux Early Childhood Assessment) and fewer externalizing problems (as measured by the Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory - Revised). Specifically, being in the TCIT-U intervention predicted more teacher use of labeled praise at post-treatment, which predicted lower child SESBI-Intensity scores at 1-month follow-up (Indirect Effect B = -1.97, SE = 0.73, p < .01). Additionally, being in the TCIT-U intervention predicted teacher follow-up on a greater proportion of direct commands post-treatment, which was associated with fewer student externalizing problem behaviors post-treatment (Indirect Effect B = -1.47, SE = 0.70, p = .04) and with higher student DECA Total Protective Factor scale scores post-treatment (Indirect Effect B = 3.72, SE = 1.63, p = .02). We discuss reasons why changing these two teacher behaviors might serve as mechanisms of change in our sample. Current findings reveal why TCIT-U might be effective as a universal prevention program that promotes socioemotional functioning and reduces externalizing behavior in racially- and ethnically-diverse samples of children with disabilities.
More Related Videos
06:57Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
Published on: May 14, 2019
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Steps in the Modeling Process
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Observational Learning