Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Polygenic risk and subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic middle-aged individuals. The ILERVAS study
Emilio Ortega1, Amanda Jiménez1, Sheila López-Ruiz1
1Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de la Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, España.
Insights
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) do not improve cardiovascular event risk prediction when added to clinical risk equations. PRS was not associated with subclinical atherosclerosis presence, severity, or extent in this study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular disease research
- Genetics and genomics
- Preventive cardiology
Background:
- Cardiovascular events (CVE) often occur in individuals deemed low or intermediate risk by current equations.
- Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are proposed to enhance the predictive accuracy of existing risk assessment tools.
- Subclinical atherosclerosis is a key indicator of future CVE risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association of PRS with the presence, severity, and extent of subclinical atherosclerosis.
- To determine if PRS improves cardiovascular risk prediction when combined with clinical risk equations like SCORE2.
- To assess the independent predictive value of PRS in primary prevention populations.
Main Methods:
- Atherosclerosis was assessed and quantified in 12 arterial territories using vascular ultrasound.
- 109 patients with atherosclerosis were matched with 109 controls based on age, sex, and SCORE2 risk.
- Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were calculated using the Cardio inCode Score®.
Main Results:
- No significant association was found between PRS and the presence of atherosclerosis (P=0.525).
- PRS did not correlate with SCORE2 clinical risk (r=-0.29, P=0.709).
- Adding PRS to SCORE2 did not improve the prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis (AUC=0.566, P=0.148).
- Atherosclerosis extent correlated with SCORE2 (P=0.009) but not PRS (P=0.709).
Conclusions:
- The studied PRS is not associated with subclinical atherosclerosis or clinical risk stratification.
- The predictive value of PRS for CVE may involve pathways independent of atherosclerosis development.
- Novel biomarkers are required to enhance subclinical atherosclerosis prediction without imaging.
Introduction And Objectives:
More than 50% of first cardiovascular events (CVE) occur in populations identified as at low or intermediate risk by the risk equations, so the inclusion of additional variables, such as polygenic risk scores (PRS), has been proposed to improve the predictive capacity of these equations. The aim of this study was to assess whether a PRS, independently or with clinical risk equations, is associated with the presence, severity and extent of subclinical atherosclerosis.
Methods:
109 subjects with atherosclerosis were selected from the ILERVAS cohort (primary prevention) and matched with 109 participants without atherosclerosis of the same age, sex and SCORE2 risk level. Atherosclerosis was assessed and quantified by arterial wall vascular ultrasound in 12 territories, and PRS was estimated using the Cardio inCode Score®. The predictive capacity of the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis was estimated, as well as the association between the extent and severity of atherosclerosis with PRS and clinical risk (SCORE2).
Results:
PRS was similar between participants with or without atherosclerosis (P=0.525). We did not find an association between PRS and SCORE2 (r=-0.29, P=0.709), and the addition of PRS to SCORE2 did not improve the prediction of atherosclerosis [AUC (95% CI)=0.566 (0.477, 0.654), P=0.148]. The extent of atherosclerosis was related to SCORE2 (P=0.009), but not to PRS (P=0.709).
Conclusions:
The Selected PRS is not associated with the presence of atherosclerosis or clinical risk, suggesting that its additional contribution to CVE risk would be mediated by mechanisms independent of the development of atherosclerosis. Additional biomarkers are needed to improve the prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis without using imaging tests as a first step in personalized assessment.
More Related Videos
09:06Quantitative Analysis of Cellular Composition in Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesions of Smooth Muscle Cell Lineage-Tracing Mice
Published on: February 20, 2019
09:38Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Myocarditis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction