Reflector-guided localization compared with wire-guided localization for non-palpable breast cancer resection:...

Wire-guided localization (WGL) for non-palpable breast cancer lesions has drawbacks like wire migration, localization difficulties, and logistical challenges. Wireless methods, such as reflector-guided localization (RGL), address these issues and are compatible with breast MRI. This study evaluates the organizational and cost impacts of RGL compared to WGL.

Our retrospective study compared the organizational impacts and costs of RGL and WGL at a university hospital. Quantitative and qualitative assessments included operating time and a questionnaire for surgeons and radiologists. Cost analysis covered device costs.

The study involved 60 patients (30 with RGL and 30 with WGL). The RGL group had a significantly longer duration between device insertion and surgery (3.73 ± 5.5 days) compared to the WGL group (same day or day before surgery). The WGL group required more devices whereas cost were higher for RGL. Health professionals reported a major positive impact of RGL on healthcare processes and safety, with minor negative impact on training.

RGL offers flexible scheduling by decoupling radiology and surgery but is limited by high costs. Further data is needed to identify ideal candidates, assess patient satisfaction, and evaluate its long-term benefits in breast cancer care.