Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Author Spotlight: Obtaining High-Quality CSF and Blood Samples for Epilepsy Biomarker Discovery
Published on: September 1, 2023
Optimal lead time for treatment of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome-a secondary data analysis
Wenrong Ge1, Ping Pang2,3,4, Ziyan Zhang2,3
1Department of Pediatrics, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Early treatment for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is crucial. Initiating first-line therapy within 1.5 months of spasm onset improves short-term response likelihood in IESS patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Epileptology
- Clinical Pediatrics
Background:
- Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common infant epilepsy.
- Early control of spasms is linked to better psychomotor development.
- Defining the optimal timeframe for early IESS treatment is critical.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine a suitable lead time for initiating first-line treatment in IESS.
- To analyze the relationship between treatment lead time and short-term response in IESS.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a cohort of 263 infants with IESS treated with ACTH.
- Investigated the impact of treatment timing on short-term response likelihood.
- Utilized restricted cubic spline and logistic regression analyses.
Main Results:
- A shorter lead time to treatment was associated with a higher short-term response rate.
- An inflection point at 1.6 months was identified, with treatment initiated after 1.5 months showing decreased response likelihood.
- Lead time >1.5 months decreased the odds of a short-term response (OR=0.59).
Conclusions:
- Initiating first-line treatment for IESS within 1.5 months of spasm onset is recommended.
- Delayed treatment beyond 1.5 months significantly reduces the likelihood of a short-term response in IESS.
- Establishing this timeframe aids in optimizing early intervention strategies for IESS.
Background:
Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common epileptic syndrome in infancy. Current first-line treatments include adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids and vigabatrin, with early control of epileptic spasms potentially benefiting long-term outcomes, such as improved psychomotor development. Early treatment, which means the prompt use of first-line treatments, is crucial for achieving an initial response in IESS. However, to date, no clear definition of the specific timeframe that constitutes early treatment has been identified. The objective of this study is to perform a secondary analysis of our previously published IESS cohort data to determine a suitable lead time.
Methods:
An analysis was conducted using a cohort of 263 children with IESS who had previously received ACTH first-line treatment. This study investigated whether intervening within a certain treatment time window could potentially increase or decrease the likelihood of a short-term response.
Results:
Out of the 263 children with IESS, 108 achieved a short-term response. The lead time of the response group was significantly shorter than that of the non-response group [1.50 (interquartile range, 1.00, 3.00) vs. 2.00 (interquartile range, 1.00, 5.00) months; P=0.003]. A restricted cubic spline graph with several adjusted variables, including time of first spasm and aetiological classification, showed a significant linear relationship between lead time and short-term response and a non-linear trend (inverted U-shaped curve), with a significant inflection point at 1.6 months. Using 1.5 months as the cutoff and dichotomising lead time, the adjusted logistic regression results showed that in children with a lead time >1.5 months, the likelihood of a short-term response decreased with increasing lead time [odds ratio (OR) =0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-0.92, P=0.041), whereas children with a lead time ≤1.5 months showed no significant association between lead time and short-term response (OR =1.03, 95% CI: 0.72-1.47, P=0.89).
Conclusions:
For children with IESS, initiating first-line treatment within 1.5 months of the onset of spasms is recommended. For those who start first-line treatment after more than 1.5 months from the onset, the likelihood of a short-term response may significantly decrease as the lead time increases.
More Related Videos
09:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization
Published on: September 20, 2024
10:22Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy
Published on: December 6, 2016