Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion01:20

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

5.2K
Collecting samples or responses from an entire population takes significant time and effort, so a researcher collects responses from only a sample of that population. Suppose a study needs to collect information about a specific mobile application. After sample collection, the researcher analyzes the data and discovers that most individuals in the sample use that specific mobile application. The sample proportion measures the number of individuals in a sample who either use or don't use the...
5.2K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

11.0K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.0K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

11.6K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.6K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detecting Uncoded Self-Harm in Veterans' Electronic Health Records Using Positive and Unlabeled Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

The Common Fund Data Ecosystem (CFDE).

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Badapple 2.0: An Empirical Predictor of Compound Promiscuity, Updated, Modernized, and Enhanced for Explainability.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

KG2ML: Integrating Knowledge Graphs and Positive Unlabeled Learning for Identifying Disease-Associated Genes.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Transcriptomic and Proteomic Insights into Host Immune Responses in Pediatric Severe Malarial Anemia: Dysregulation in HSP60-70-TLR2/4 Signaling and Altered Glutamine Metabolism.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

TIN-X version 3: update with expanded dataset and modernized architecture for enhanced illumination of understudied targets.

PeerJ·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.5K

Positive Unlabeled Learning Selected Not At Random (PULSNAR): class proportion estimation without the selected

Praveen Kumar1, Christophe G Lambert1

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Translational Informatics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, United States.

Peerj. Computer Science
|December 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary

New algorithms improve positive and unlabeled (PU) learning by addressing the selected not at random (SNAR) issue. PULSNAR enhances classification accuracy in real-world scenarios where true negatives are scarce.

Keywords:
Class imbalanceClass priorMachine learningMixture proportion estimationNoisy label learningPULSCARPULSNARPositive-unlabeled learningProbability calibrationSCARSNARSemi-supervised learning

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

6.5K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

11.8K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Data Science
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Positive and unlabeled (PU) learning is a semi-supervised classification method crucial when obtaining negative instances is difficult.
  • Existing PU algorithms often assume positives are selected completely at random (SCAR), which fails in many real-world applications like healthcare.
  • The SCAR assumption violation leads to inaccurate estimation of the positive proportion (α) and poor model calibration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel PU learning algorithms that can estimate α and provide calibrated probabilities for unlabeled instances.
  • To improve classification metrics in scenarios where positives are selected not at random (SNAR).

Main Methods:

  • Proposed two algorithms: PULSCAR (Positive Unlabeled Learning Selected Completely At Random) and PULSNAR (Positive Unlabeled Learning Selected Not At Random).
  • PULSNAR utilizes a divide-and-conquer strategy to cluster SNAR positives into subtypes.
  • α is estimated for each subtype by applying PULSCAR to the clustered positives and all unlabeled data.

Main Results:

  • PULSNAR effectively handles SNAR data, improving the estimation of α and model calibration.
  • The proposed algorithms demonstrated superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods on synthetic and real-world datasets.
  • PULSNAR achieved better classification metrics, indicating more reliable identification of positive instances.

Conclusions:

  • The PULSNAR algorithm offers a robust solution for PU learning problems with SNAR characteristics.
  • This approach enhances the practical applicability of PU learning in fields like healthcare and drug discovery.
  • The developed methods provide more accurate and reliable classification in challenging semi-supervised settings.