Machine Learning Models for Efficient Property Prediction of ABX3 Materials: A High-Throughput Approach
Soundous Touati1,2, Ali Benghia1, Zoulikha Hebboul3
1Laboratoire de Physique des Matériaux, Université Amar Telidji de Laghouat, BP 37G, Laghouat 03000, Algeria.
Abstract:
Recently, ABX3 materials have garnered significant attention due to their diverse applications in photovoltaics, catalysis, and optoelectronics as well as their remarkable efficiency in energy conversion. However, progress has been somewhat slow due to the high expenses of the experiment or the time-consuming density functional theory (DFT) calculation. In this study, we utilized the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to facilitate the discovery and characterization of ABX3 compounds based on vast data sets generated by DFT calculations. While the XGBoost algorithm provides a powerful tool for accelerating the discovery of ABX3 compounds, it is crucial to acknowledge that different DFT approximation levels can significantly impact the predicted band gaps, potentially introducing discrepancies when compared with experimental values. In the first step, we predict the space group of 13947 oxides and halides using the Open Quantum Materials Database and elemental features. Our analysis yields classification accuracies ranging from 82.39% to 99.14% across these materials. Following this, XGBoost regression algorithms are employed to interrogate the data set, enabling predictions of volume (achieving an optimal accuracy of 98.41%, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.395 Å3 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 4.416 Å3), formation energy (an optimal accuracy of 97.36%, with an MAE of 0.075 eV/atom and an RMSE of 0.132 eV/atom), and band gap energy (an optimal accuracy of 87.00%, an MAE of 0.391 eV, and an RMSE of 0.574 eV). Finally, these prediction models are employed to identify the possible space groups for each of the 1252 new ABX3 formulas. Then, we predict the volume, the formation energy, and the band gap energy for each candidate space group. Through these predictive models, machine learning accelerates the exploration of new materials with enhanced performance and functionality.
More Related Videos
13:49Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates
Published on: December 6, 2017
06:50Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
The...
Classification and Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Polymers
