Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics
Published on: February 28, 2025
The Impact of Stance Width on Kinematics and Kinetics During Maximum Back Squats
Stian Larsen1, Mark de Zee2, Roland van den Tillaar1
1Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Norway; and.
Abstract:
Larsen, S, Zee, Md, and Tillaar, Rvd. The impact of stance width on kinematics and kinetics during maximum back squats. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 1-9, 2025-This study compared the lower extremity peak net joint moments (NJMs) and muscle forces between wide and narrow stance widths defined as 1.7 and 0.7 acromion width in the last repetition of the concentric phase in 3 repetition maximum back squats. Twelve recreationally trained men (age:25.3 ± 2.9 years, height:179 ± 7.7 cm, body mass:82.8 ± 6.9 kg) volunteered for the study. The NJMs were estimated using inverse dynamics and individual muscle forces with static optimization. The main findings of interest were that the wide stance resulted in statistically smaller knee flexion angles (Cohen's d: 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -17.96 to -3.18°), knee extension NJMs [d: 1.45; 95% CI: -1.56 to -0.61 Nm·kg-1], and vastii forces [d: 1.3; 95% CI: -27.7 to -0.9.5 N·kg-1] compared with the narrow stance. Moreover, we observed significantly larger hip abduction angles [d: 3.8; 95% CI: 12.04 to 16.86°] for the wide stance. Hence, we suggest that recreationally trained men aiming to optimize muscle forces in the vastii muscles during maximum back squat training should consider adopting a narrow stance.
More Related Videos
08:40Quantifying Arms and Legs Contributions during Repetitive Electrically-Assisted Sit-To-Stand Exercise in Paraplegics: A Pilot Study
Published on: November 11, 2022
08:24Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016