Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026
Reconstitution Of β-catenin Degradation In Xenopus Egg Extract
Published on: June 17, 2014
Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining as a surrogate for β-catenin (CTNNB1) mutations
Ekkehard Hewer1,2, Pascal David Fischer2, Erik Vassella2
1Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland ekkehard.hewer@unil.ch m.dettmer@klinikum-stuttgart.de.
Aims:
Mutations affecting exon 3 of the β-catenin (CTNNB1) gene result in constitutive activation of WNT signalling and are a diagnostic hallmark of several tumour entities including desmoid-type fibromatosis. They also define clinically relevant tumour subtypes within certain entities, such as endometrioid carcinoma. In diagnostics, β-catenin immunohistochemistry is widely used as a surrogate for CTNNB1 mutations. Yet, it is often difficult to assess in practice, given that the characteristic nuclear translocation may be focal or hard to distinguish from the spillover of the normal membranous staining.
Methods:
We therefore examined lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining, a nuclear marker of WNT activation that serves as a potential surrogate for CTNNB1 mutations.
Results:
In a cohort of endometrial carcinomas with known mutation status (n=130) LEF1 was 85% accurate in predicting CTNNB1 mutation status (64% sensitivity, 90% specificity) while β-catenin was 76% accurate (72% sensitivity; 77% specificity). Across a variety of entities characterised by CTNNB1 mutations as putative drivers, we found diffuse and strong expression of LEF1 in 77% of cases. LEF1 immunostaining proved easier to interpret than β-catenin immunostaining in 54% of cases, more difficult in 1% of cases and comparable in the remaining cases.
Conclusion:
We conclude that LEF1 immunostaining is a useful surrogate marker for CTNNB1 mutations. It favourably complements β-catenin immunohistochemistry and outperforms the latter as a single marker.
