Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Confidence Intervals for the Risk Difference Between Secondary and Primary Infection Based on the Method of Variance
Chao Chen1,2, Yuanzhen Li1, Qitong Wei1
1School of Public Health, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.
Abstract:
The risk difference (RD) between the secondary infection, given the primary infection, and the primary infection can be a useful measure of the change in the infection rates of the primary infection and the secondary infection. It plays an important role in pharmacology and epidemiology. The method of variance estimate recovery (MOVER) is used to construct confidence intervals (CIs) for the RD. Seven types of CIs for binomial proportion are introduced to obtain MOVER-based CIs for the RD. The simulation studies show that the Agresti-Coull CI, score method incorporating continuity correction CI, Clopper Pearson CI, and Bayesian credibility CI are conservative. The Jeffreys CI, Wilson score CI, and Arcsin CI draw a satisfactory performance; they are suitable for various practical application scenarios as they can provide accurate and reliable results. To illustrate that the recommended CIs are competitive or even better than other methods, three real datasets were used.
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Confidence Intervals
A...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Relative Risk
Margin of Error

