How interoceptive sensibility moderates decision-making: an fMRI study of neuroforecasting mobile games engagement
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Interoceptive sensibility (IS) influences how neural activity, affect, and value integration predict choices. Higher IS enhances the predictive power of brain activity for aggregate choices, extending decision-making frameworks.
Area Of Science
- Neuroscience
- Decision Science
- Cognitive Science
Background
- The Affect-Integration-Motivation (AIM) framework links neural activity to choice prediction.
- Interoceptive sensibility (IS) involves heightened awareness of bodily sensations and may influence decision-making coherence.
Purpose Of The Study
- Investigate how IS modulates the relationship between neural/affective measures and choice prediction.
- Explore neural underpinnings of individual and aggregate choices in mobile gaming.
- Test the moderating effect of IS on prediction models.
Main Methods
- Neuroimaging techniques to identify neural correlates of choice, affect, and outcomes.
- Analysis of affective ratings, neural activity, and behavioral choices (downloads, revenue).
- Comparison of prediction models between high and low IS subgroups.
Main Results
- Individual choice linked to Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc) activity; aggregate downloads correlated with salience network activity.
- Affective ratings and Amygdala Insula (AI) activity predicted individual downloads; medial Prefrontal Cortex (mPFC) activity predicted aggregate downloads.
- High IS group showed stronger coherence between neural activity, affect, and choice; mPFC activity significantly predicted aggregate downloads in this group.
Conclusions
- IS plays a crucial role in the neurobehavioral mechanisms of decision-making.
- The AIM framework is extended by demonstrating IS's influence on integrating neural and affective information for choice.
- Findings highlight the importance of interoception in understanding individual and aggregate decision-making patterns.

