Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Self-Determined Motivation for Alcohol Use and Drinking Frequency, Intensity, and Consequences
J B Courtney1,2, M A Russell3, D E Conroy4,5
1Department of Exercise and Sport Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Self-determination theory (SDT) motives for drinking, like autonomous reasons, predict enjoyable, low-risk alcohol use. Conversely, amotivation for drinking signals increased negative alcohol-related consequences.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Health Behavior
- Addiction Research
Background:
- Drinking motives influence adult drinking behaviors and outcomes.
- Self-determination theory (SDT) offers a complementary framework to understand drinking motives and alcohol-related consequences.
- Existing frameworks rarely incorporate SDT, limiting explanations for drinking motive heterogeneity and outcome variance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine associations between five SDT-based drinking motives and drinking frequency, intensity, and consequences.
- To assess the added explanatory power of SDT-based motives beyond existing questionnaires.
- To explore the utility of SDT in understanding diverse drinking patterns and risks.
Main Methods:
- 630 adults (mean age 21.5, 55% female, 88% undergraduates) completed measures of drinking motives (CRAI-Drinking, DMQ), alcohol consumption, and consequences.
- Poisson regressions analyzed the relationship between SDT-based motives and drinking frequency, intensity, and consequences.
- Statistical models controlled for demographic variables, other motive scores, and drinking intensity.
Main Results:
- Intrinsic and identified regulations were linked to higher drinking frequency.
- Identified and positive introjected regulations were associated with drinking intensity.
- Amotivation and intrinsic regulation predicted negative and positive consequences, respectively.
- SDT-based motives explained an additional 1.7%-9.9% of the variance in drinking behaviors and consequences, controlling for other factors.
Conclusions:
- Autonomous drinking motives (intrinsic, identified) are associated with positive drinking experiences (low-risk, high-enjoyment).
- High amotivation for drinking predicts more negative consequences, independent of drinking intensity, suggesting it's a risk indicator.
- SDT provides a valuable theoretical lens for understanding the complexity of drinking motives, behaviors, and associated risks.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...

