Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Raman Spectroscopy Instrumentation: Overview01:26

Raman Spectroscopy Instrumentation: Overview

296
A conventional Raman spectrophotometer includes a laser source, a sample holding system, a wavelength selector, and a detector.
The monochromatic laser source, typically using visible or near-infrared radiation, generates a highly focused beam of light. This light interacts with the molecules of the sample, scattering some of the light. Liquid and gaseous samples are usually tested in ordinary glass capillaries, while solids can be analyzed as powders packed in capillaries or as potassium...
296
Raman Spectroscopy: Overview01:20

Raman Spectroscopy: Overview

307
The underlying principle of Raman spectroscopy is based on the interaction between light and matter, specifically molecules' inelastic scattering of photons. When a monochromatic beam of light, typically from a laser source, interacts with a sample, most scattered light has the same frequency as the incident light. This is known as Rayleigh scattering.
However, a small fraction of the scattered light exhibits a frequency shift due to the exchange of energy between the incident photons and...
307
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations01:08

IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations

913
Identical bonds within a polyatomic group can stretch symmetrically (in-phase) or asymmetrically (out-of-phase). Similar to hydrogen bonding, these vibrations also influence the shape of the IR peak. Generally, asymmetric stretching frequencies are higher than symmetric stretching frequencies. For example, primary amines exhibit two distinct IR peaks between 3300–3500 cm−1 corresponding to the symmetric and asymmetric N-H stretching, while secondary amines exhibit a single...
913
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

1.2K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
1.2K
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting01:13

¹H NMR: Complex Splitting

1.2K
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
1.2K
IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region01:03

IR Frequency Region: Fingerprint Region

756
IR spectra are divided into two main regions: the diagnostic region and the fingerprint region. The diagnostic region of the spectrum lies above 1500 cm−1. The absorptions resulting from single-bond vibrations of the N–H, C–H, and O–H stretch at higher wavenumbers and appear on the left side of the spectrum. The stretching absorptions of the C≡C and C≡N occur between 2100–2300 cm−1. In contrast, those arising from stretching absorptions of the...
756

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design, Synthesis, and Antifungal Activity of <i>N</i>-(alkoxy)-Diphenyl Ether Carboxamide Derivates as Novel Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Finite-size effect on the percolation and electromechanical behaviors of liquid metal particulate composites.

Soft matter·2024
Same author

Role of PERK-Mediated Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Ferroptosis Caused by Hexavalent Chromium in Chicken Hepatocytes.

Biological trace element research·2024
Same author

Association Between the Frequency of Tooth Brushing and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Angiology·2024
Same author

The surface morphology of Atractylodes macrocephala polysaccharide and its inhibitory effect on PCV2 replication.

Journal of the science of food and agriculture·2023
Same author

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Myeloid Mutations Is a High-Risk Disease Associated with Clonal Hematopoiesis.

Blood cancer discovery·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional &#960;-conjugate Systems
09:57

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional π-conjugate Systems

Published on: February 10, 2020

7.1K

Triplet Network for One-Shot Raman Spectrum Recognition.

Bo Wang1,2, Pu Zhang1, Wei Zhao1

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shaanxi, China.

Applied Spectroscopy
|December 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel Triplet network (TN) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) approach for Raman spectroscopy. This method accurately identifies materials using minimal training data, even with background fluorescence.

Keywords:
Raman spectrumTriplet networkmaterial recognitionone-shot learning

More Related Videos

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy
15:04

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy

Published on: May 18, 2011

13.1K
Multiplex Chemical Imaging Based on Broadband Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy
09:57

Multiplex Chemical Imaging Based on Broadband Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy

Published on: July 25, 2022

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional &#960;-conjugate Systems
09:57

Ultrafast Time-resolved Near-IR Stimulated Raman Measurements of Functional π-conjugate Systems

Published on: February 10, 2020

7.1K
Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy
15:04

Rejection of Fluorescence Background in Resonance and Spontaneous Raman Microspectroscopy

Published on: May 18, 2011

13.1K
Multiplex Chemical Imaging Based on Broadband Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy
09:57

Multiplex Chemical Imaging Based on Broadband Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy

Published on: July 25, 2022

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Spectroscopy
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Raman spectroscopy is valuable for material detection but struggles with limited training data for spectral recognition.
  • Traditional machine learning and neural networks often lack the precision needed for complex spectral analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method combining Triplet network (TN) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) for enhanced Raman spectral recognition.
  • To improve the accuracy and efficiency of material identification using Raman spectroscopy, especially with limited data.

Main Methods:

  • Mapping Raman spectral sequences into a 128-dimensional Euclidean space using TN for feature extraction.
  • Utilizing the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm for classification within the extracted feature space.
  • Employing a handheld Raman spectrometer (785 nm excitation) on 36 samples (28 safe, 8 hazardous).

Main Results:

  • Achieved 99.6% accuracy in distinguishing hazardous from safe materials using only one training spectrum per class.
  • Demonstrated superior performance in recognizing unknown Raman spectra with minimal training samples.
  • Showcased adaptability for adding new prediction classes without extensive retraining.
  • TN exhibited improved distance measurement between spectra in high background fluorescence conditions compared to traditional methods.

Conclusions:

  • The TN-KNN approach significantly enhances Raman spectral recognition accuracy and efficiency, particularly in data-scarce scenarios.
  • This method offers a robust and adaptable solution for material detection using Raman spectroscopy.
  • The technique shows promise for real-world applications requiring precise material identification with minimal data and in challenging environments.