Neurorights Training of a Multidisciplinary Studentship Based on Realistic Neuroscience

Area of Science:

• Neuroethics
• Neuroscience
• Law

Background:

• Rigorous analysis of neurorights necessitates an interdisciplinary approach.
• Global regulatory initiatives on neurorights are expanding.
• Neuroethics often lacks a comprehensive neuroscientific perspective.

Purpose of the Study:

• To provide an introductory course on neurorights from a neuroscientific viewpoint.
• To address the need for interdisciplinary understanding in neuroethics.
• To explore current and emerging neurotechnologies relevant to neurorights.

Main Methods:

• A 10-hour introductory course was developed and delivered.
• The course targeted sixty students from diverse academic backgrounds (neuroscience, psychology, law, etc.).
• Content included current neurorights discussions and cutting-edge brain activity registration, analysis, and manipulation technologies.

Main Results:

• The course successfully addressed existing neurorights concerns.
• New, less-discussed concerns regarding neurorights were identified.
• Key issues identified include brain data privacy, algorithmic bias in neurotechnology, and informed consent for invasive neuroscientific techniques.

Conclusions:

• Neuroscientific perspectives are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of neurorights.
• Protecting brain data privacy is a primary concern.
• Addressing algorithmic bias and enhancing informed consent are critical for ethical neurotechnology development and deployment.