What is limiting how we imagine climate change adaptation?

Area of Science:

• Environmental Science
• Climate Change Adaptation
• Sustainability Studies

Background:

• Dominant adaptation imaginaries are technocratic, homogenous, and top-down, limiting global sustainable and just adaptation.
• Three key problematic practices identified: assumption of universality, neglect of pluralistic knowledge, and oversimplified processes.

Purpose of the Study:

• To critique current adaptation imaginaries and practices.
• To propose alternative conceptualizations and practices for more effective adaptation.
• To highlight the need for expanded visions in adaptation planning.

Main Methods:

• Literature review and conceptual analysis of adaptation practices.
• Examination of two case studies: everyday adaptations and nature-based solutions.
• Analysis of how alternative imaginaries influence adaptation governance.

Main Results:

• Problematic practices lead to reproduced vulnerabilities, unsustainable outcomes, or temporary changes.
• Alternative imaginaries can localize adaptation practice.
• Acknowledging diverse knowledge systems and iterative governance is crucial.

Conclusions:

• New conceptualizations of adaptation are essential for effective and equitable outcomes.
• Localizing adaptation through pluralistic knowledge and iterative governance enhances resilience.
• Expanding adaptation imaginaries promotes sustainable and just adaptation worldwide.