Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
Published on: October 1, 2019
Developing inverse motion planning technique for autonomous vehicles using integral nonlinear constraints.
1Department of Civil Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B2K3, Canada.
This study introduces a novel autonomous vehicle motion planning technique using sequential trajectory and speed optimization. The method enhances control accuracy and efficiency by employing finite elements and an inverse approach for smoother, more predictable vehicle paths.
Area of Science:
- Robotics and Control Systems
- Computational Mathematics
Background:
- Autonomous vehicle motion planning requires sophisticated trajectory and speed optimization.
- Existing methods often face challenges with differentiability and constraint satisfaction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elaborate and validate a novel technique for autonomous vehicle motion planning.
- To compare two models with varying degrees of freedom (DOF) for optimization quality, stability, and real-time performance.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing finite elements (FE) to represent functions, a vehicle kinematic model, and sequential quadratic programming for optimization.
- Implementing an inverse approach with integrated polynomials for curvature and speed, and Gaussian N-point quadrature integration.
- Employing piecewise functions with 2 and 3 DOF, and replacing nodal linear constraints with integral nonlinear ones.
Main Results:
- The developed technique ensures higher differentiability, resulting in simple and unambiguous reference curves for improved control accuracy.
- Integral nonlinear constraints guarantee non-violation of boundary limits within each finite element.
- Simulation results demonstrate smoothed geometric and kinematic parameters up to the highest derivatives.
Conclusions:
- The proposed motion planning technique is efficient and provides high-quality prognosis for autonomous vehicles.
- The study highlights the trade-offs between optimization quality, stability, and rapidity for different DOF models in real-time applications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
PI Controller: Design
Velocity and Position by Integral Method
Consider an example to calculate the velocity and position from the acceleration function. A motorboat is traveling at a constant velocity of 5.0 m/s when it starts to decelerate to arrive at the dock. Its acceleration is...
Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length,...
Equation of Motion: General Plane motion - Problem Solving
The friction between the roller and the ground is characterized by two coefficients. The static friction coefficient is 0.15, while the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.1. These values are crucial in understanding the interaction between...

