Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025
Bile Duct Ligation in Mice: Induction of Inflammatory Liver Injury and Fibrosis by Obstructive Cholestasis
Published on: February 10, 2015
Low-risk individuals with primary biliary cholangitis and significant liver stiffness: prognosis and treatment
Dawei Ding1, Yinan Hu1, Gui Jia1
1State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Background:
Some patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) or combined fenofibrate had well-controlled biochemical parameters but high liver stiffness, and the prognosis as well as therapeutic options for these patients may be an area worthy of further exploration.
Aims:
To explore the prognosis and treatment of patients with low-risk and high liver stiffness.
Methods:
A retrospective study included 424 cases of UDCA monotherapy and 102 cases of combined fenofibrate treatment.
Results:
The combination of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and the GLOBE score improved prognostic prediction for patients with UDCA monotherapy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] of 0.868 (0.811-0.925) for the fitted model and 0.834 (0.767-0.900) for the GLOBE score, p = 0.006). Further analyses revealed that LSM had an additive prognostic effect mainly in low-risk patients defined by GLOBE < 0.5 (AUC, 0.777 [0.724-0.825] vs 0.642 [0.583-0.699], p = 0.001). For patients in the low-risk group, the prognosis was worse when LSM > 11 kPa (7/53 [13%] vs 2/227 [1%], p = 0.001). The prognosis was consistent between patients in the "low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa" group and the medium-risk group defined by 0.5 < GLOBE < 1.8 (7/53 [13%] vs 22/121 [18%], p = 0.418). In low-risk patients treated with combined fenofibrate therapy, the prognosis was worse when LSM > 11 kPa (3/21 [14%] vs 0/47 [0%], p = 0.022). The prognosis was consistent between patients in the "low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa" and the medium-risk groups (3/21 [14%] vs 6/27 [22%], p = 0.353). Antifibrotic drugs failed to reduce the incidence of the primary outcome (5/45 [11%] vs 5/27 [19%], p = 0.598), and delayed the progression of LSM in patients with low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa at 36 months of follow-up (changes in LSM, - 3.31 [- 5.04 to - 1.52] vs - 1.74 [- 2.83 to 1.5], p = 0.046).
Conclusions:
Patients with GLOBE-defined low-risk and LSM > 11 kPa had a poor prognosis, and antifibrotic therapy may slow the progression of liver stiffness in these patients.
Related Concept Videos
01:29Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
01:17Chronic Bowel Disorders: Introduction
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract. The distinctive feature is recurrent abdominal pain associated with altered bowel movements, manifesting as constipation, diarrhea, or fluctuating between both. The...
01:30Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
01:28Pleural Effusion II: Symptoms and Management
A pleural effusion is the abnormal collection of fluid between the parietal and visceral pleura layers of tissue that form the lining of the lungs and chest cavity. It can occur independently or due to surrounding parenchymal diseases, such as infection, malignancy, or inflammatory conditions.
Clinical Manifestations:
01:25Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
01:26Diseases of the Liver and Gallbladder
Cirrhosis is characterized by the scarring of hepatic lobules in the liver, which are replaced by fibrous tissue, affecting the liver's normal functioning. NAFLD, on the other hand, is caused by an excessive build-up of fat in the liver, not...