Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Base-pairing and DNA Repair

Base-pairing and DNA Repair

Base Excision Repair

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide Excision Repair

DNA Distortion and Damage
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...

Overview of DNA Repair

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Functional profiling of serine, threonine and tyrosine sites.

Nature chemical biology·2024

Same author

Genome-wide interrogation of gene functions through base editor screens empowered by barcoded sgRNAs.

Nature biotechnology·2021

Same author

A carbon-nanotube-supported graphene-rich non-precious metal oxygen reduction catalyst with enhanced performance durability.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2013

Same author

Production of hydroxypyruvate from glycerate by a novel biotechnological route.

Bioresource technology·2013

Same author

New constitutive vectors: useful genetic engineering tools for biocatalysis.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2013

Same author

Evolutionary characterization of the pandemic H1N1/2009 influenza virus in humans based on non-structural genes.

PloS one·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

Mapping functional elements of the DNA damage response through base editor screens.

Qian Pan¹, Zhixuan Zhang¹, Yangfang Xiong¹

¹Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University Genome Editing Research Center, State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

|December 11, 2024

Summary

Researchers identified key gene mutations affecting DNA damage response using CRISPR base editing. These findings reveal new insights into DNA repair mechanisms and potential cancer therapy targets.

Keywords:

CP: Molecular biology CRISPR screen DNA damage response base editing screen functional genomics lysine residue

More Related Videos

Visualizing and Quantifying Endonuclease-Based Site-Specific DNA Damage

Visualizing and Quantifying Endonuclease-Based Site-Specific DNA Damage

Published on: August 21, 2021

Visualization of miniSOG Tagged DNA Repair Proteins in Combination with Electron Spectroscopic Imaging ESI

Visualization of miniSOG Tagged DNA Repair Proteins in Combination with Electron Spectroscopic Imaging ESI

Published on: September 24, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

Visualizing and Quantifying Endonuclease-Based Site-Specific DNA Damage

Visualizing and Quantifying Endonuclease-Based Site-Specific DNA Damage

Published on: August 21, 2021

Visualization of miniSOG Tagged DNA Repair Proteins in Combination with Electron Spectroscopic Imaging ESI

Visualization of miniSOG Tagged DNA Repair Proteins in Combination with Electron Spectroscopic Imaging ESI

Published on: September 24, 2015

Area of Science:

Genetics and Molecular Biology
Cellular Biology
Cancer Research

Background:

Genomic stability is crucial for cell function.
DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are critical for maintaining genomic integrity.
Understanding DDR mechanisms is vital for developing cancer therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify novel mutations in lysine residues and genes impacting DNA damage sensitivity.
To characterize the functional consequences of these mutations in response to DNA-damaging agents.
To explore the role of STK35 in DNA repair pathways.

Main Methods:

CRISPR-mediated base editing combined with pooled screening.
Identification and characterization of loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations.
Analysis of protein-protein interactions, specifically C17orf53 with RPA proteins.

Main Results:

Numerous mutations in lysine residues and genes affecting sensitivity/resistance to DNA-damaging agents were identified.
The K494 mutation in C17orf53 was found to disrupt RPA interaction, increasing cisplatin sensitivity.
STK35 was identified as a novel gene involved in DNA damage response pathways.

Conclusions:

This study provides a valuable resource for understanding DNA damage response genes.
Identified mutations offer insights into cellular responses to DNA damage and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.
STK35 represents a new target for investigation in DNA repair and cancer therapy.