Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025
Evaluation of Integrated Anaerobic Digestion and Hydrothermal Carbonization for Bioenergy Production
Published on: June 15, 2014
Advanced anaerobic co-digestion of hydrothermally pretreated wheat straw: Process performance, techno-economic and
Ali Mohammad Rahmani1, Rendra Hakim Hafyan2, Vinay Kumar Tyagi3
1Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, 247667, India; Water and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kandahar University, Afghanistan.
Abstract:
Hydrothermal and thermal-alkali pretreatment potential was investigated to enhance agro-wastes' anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD). The techno-economic (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of biogas upgrading (BioCNG) and energy generation via combined heat and power (CHP) processes for energy utilization were carried out to realize the environmental impacts and cost-effectiveness of the studied processes. Three AcoD conditions of untreated, hydrothermally (150 °C, 60 min) and thermal-alkali pretreated (1% NaOH, 150 °C- 60 min) wheat straw (WS) with food waste and cow manure were studied in semi-continuous mode for 340 days under variable organic loading rates (OLR, 1.25-3.75 gVS/L.d). At an OLR of 1.67 gVS/L.d and 45 days HRT, the methane yield and volatile solids removal in control digester were 231 mL/gVS and 39.7%, and in thermal-alkali pretreated digester were 302 mL/gVS and 53.3%, presenting an increase of 30% and 34% over control, respectively. The LCA and TEA of all three processes under 45 days of HRT operations were carried out. The environmental performance evaluation across various scenarios indicated that integrating pretreatment with the combined heat and power (CHP) process significantly lowered the global warming potential (GWP), outperforming the BioCNG process. In particular, hydrothermal pretreatment made the largest contribution to the reduction in GWP, achieving a value of -0.1935 kg CO2-equivalent, primarily due to energy generation from the CHP process. In comparison, the BioCNG process recorded a GWP of -0.0377 kg CO2-equivalent. This result demonstrates that the CHP process led to an 81% greater reduction in GWP than the BioCNG process. While the BioCNG process surpassed CHP in terms of economic performance, the hydrothermal pretreatment scenario proved to be financially the most advantageous, with a net present value (NPV) of $10.16 million, an internal rate of return (IRR) of 13%, and a shorter payback period (PBP) of 14 years.
