Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Interphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization of Bone Marrow Smears of Multiple Myeloma
Published on: April 15, 2022
High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: PETHEMA-GEM experience
Veronica González-Calle1, Paula Rodriguez-Otero2, Maria J Calasanz2
1Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cancer (IBMCC-USAL, CSIC) CIBERONC Salamanca Spain.
Cytogenetic abnormalities significantly impact multiple myeloma (MM) prognosis. Co-occurring abnormalities, particularly t(4;14), worsen outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive genetic assessment in MM patients.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Genetics
Background:
- Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by genetic complexity.
- Cytogenetic abnormalities play a crucial role in MM pathogenesis and patient prognosis.
- Understanding the impact of specific genetic alterations and their co-segregation is vital for accurate risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prognostic significance of individual and co-segregating cytogenetic abnormalities in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients.
- To evaluate the impact of specific genetic alterations, including t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p), +1q, and del(1p), on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1304 newly diagnosed MM patients from four GEM-PETHEMA clinical trials.
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to detect genetic alterations in CD38 purified plasma cells.
- Statistical analysis was performed to assess the impact of cytogenetic abnormalities and their co-segregation on PFS and OS.
Main Results:
- The study identified frequencies of del(17p) (8%), t(4;14) (12%), t(14;16) (3%), +1q (43%), and del(1p) (8%).
- t(4;14) and gain(1q) were associated with shorter PFS and OS. Del(17p) showed poor prognosis with a cut-off of ≥20% positive cells.
- Co-segregation of abnormalities worsened prognosis in t(4;14) patients, while del(17p) retained its adverse effect independently. The detrimental effect of +1q or del(1p) was diminished when co-segregation was excluded.
Conclusions:
- High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities are confirmed as significant prognostic factors in MM.
- The co-occurrence of cytogenetic abnormalities significantly influences MM patient outcomes.
- Accurate prognosis assessment in MM requires consideration of both individual genetic alterations and their co-segregation patterns.
More Related Videos
10:04Establishment of a Human Multiple Myeloma Xenograft Model in the Chicken to Study Tumor Growth, Invasion and Angiogenesis
Published on: May 1, 2015
09:41An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015