Advancing poliovirus eradication: lessons learned from piloting direct molecular detection of polioviruses in

Paula L Marcet1, Brandon Short1, Ashley Deas2

  • 1Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Microbiology Spectrum
|December 12, 2024
PubMed

Insights

A new Direct Detection strategy (DD-ITD) shows promise for poliovirus screening in acute flaccid paralysis surveillance, detecting more positive samples than traditional methods. However, implementation requires advanced molecular skills and confirmatory sequencing.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Public Health Surveillance

Background:

  • The Global Polio Laboratory Network (GPLN) relies on virus isolation (VI) for poliovirus (PV) screening, which has long turnaround times and involves live virus amplification.
  • An alternative Direct Detection - Internal Temperature-dependent (DD-ITD) strategy has been developed to bypass cell culture for faster screening of viral nucleic acid from stools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To field-test the performance and applicability of the DD-ITD method in a multi-laboratory setting within the WHO African, Western Pacific, and Eastern Mediterranean regions.
  • To compare the DD-ITD strategy against the gold-standard virus isolation (VI) method for poliovirus detection in acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance.

Main Methods:

  • Twelve GPLN laboratories simultaneously processed over 10,500 stool specimens using both the DD-ITD strategy and the conventional VI method.
  • Quality assessment of RNA extraction and rRT-PCR runs was performed for both methodologies.
  • Results were compiled and analyzed to evaluate method agreement, sensitivity, and specificity.

Main Results:

  • The DD-ITD strategy detected more presumptive poliovirus-positive samples compared to VI across all laboratories.
  • Overall method agreement between DD-ITD and VI was 91%, with 2.8% of samples positive by both methods.
  • A significant proportion (72%) of DD-ITD positive results were inconclusive or non-typeable, necessitating confirmatory sequencing. Performance varied significantly among laboratories.

Conclusions:

  • The DD-ITD strategy offers a potentially faster alternative for poliovirus screening but requires further validation and optimization.
  • Successful implementation necessitates enhanced proficiency in advanced molecular techniques, robust data analysis, and increased capacity for confirmatory sequencing.
  • Variability in laboratory performance highlights the need for standardized training and quality control measures for DD-ITD adoption.